2014
DOI: 10.1080/1060586x.2014.889365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing constructivism: why not more “Cossacks” in Krasnodar Kray?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The noticeable exceptions here are works by Appleby (2010), Arnold (2014), Boeck (1998Boeck ( , 2004, Holquist (2009), and Toje (2006). 4.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. The noticeable exceptions here are works by Appleby (2010), Arnold (2014), Boeck (1998Boeck ( , 2004, Holquist (2009), and Toje (2006). 4.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…He writes that "this mobilisation pursues certain goals, mainly on the part of a limited number of activists" (21). Since this conversation took place the debate about Cossack identity in the post-Soviet space has developed along the line of ethnicity negotiating the question of whether the contemporary Cossacks are an ethnic group or a social/professional/political movement or organisation (Appleby 2010;Arnold 2014;Boeck 2004;Holquist 2009;Markedonov 2004). Nonetheless, Tishkov's view of memory as one of the central pillars of the Cossack identity construction seems to be essential for understanding the Cossack revival, which has also been defined by some observers as the Neo-Cossack movement (Derluguian and Cipko 1997;Markedonov 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%