1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00506.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Control Theory and Differential Association: A Reanalysis of the Richmond Youth Project Data*

Abstract: In what has become a classic work in the field, Matsueda (1982) tested control theory against differential association theory using Hirschi's (1969) Richmond Youth Project data. Matsueda found that measures of “definitions favorable to law violation” entirely mediated the effect of his social control measures and friends' delinquency, and concluded that differential association theory was supported over control theory. We note several problems with Matsueda's specification of control theory, and we reanalyze t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
51
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These theories are the most frequently applied, tested, and endorsed by American criminologists as explanations of both serious and minor offending Stitt & Giacopassi, 1992). The research literature on these theories, then, is extensive and some of it compares the two with one another and with other theories (Agnew, 1991b;Akers, 1998;Akers & Cochran, 1985;Akers et al, 1979;Akers & Lee, 1999;Akers & Sellers, 2004;Benda, 1994;Benda & DiBlasio, 1991;Costello, 2000;Costello & Vowell, 1999;Kandel & Davies, 1991;Krohn, Lanza-Kaduce, & Akers, 1984;Longshore, 1998;Matsueda & Heimer, 1987;McGee, 1992;White, Pandina, & LaGrange, 1987;Wright, Caspi, Moffitt, & Silva, 1999). A few studies have been done outside North America.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories are the most frequently applied, tested, and endorsed by American criminologists as explanations of both serious and minor offending Stitt & Giacopassi, 1992). The research literature on these theories, then, is extensive and some of it compares the two with one another and with other theories (Agnew, 1991b;Akers, 1998;Akers & Cochran, 1985;Akers et al, 1979;Akers & Lee, 1999;Akers & Sellers, 2004;Benda, 1994;Benda & DiBlasio, 1991;Costello, 2000;Costello & Vowell, 1999;Kandel & Davies, 1991;Krohn, Lanza-Kaduce, & Akers, 1984;Longshore, 1998;Matsueda & Heimer, 1987;McGee, 1992;White, Pandina, & LaGrange, 1987;Wright, Caspi, Moffitt, & Silva, 1999). A few studies have been done outside North America.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of SCT, we propose a new set of measures that index the element of organizational trust and are represented by four factors: attachment, commitment, involvement, and norms [3,8,17,28]. We adopted the research framework from the theory of reasoned action (TRA) [7,27] and theory of planned behavior [6].…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social bonds with conventional adult institutions are crucial for furnishing social capital that effectively dampens behavioral problems (Costello and Vowell, 1999;Dornbusch, Erickson, Laird, and Wong, 2001). By contrast, the effect of peer support on the relief of emotional problems in youth is less decisive than that of reducing behavioral problems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%