Testing cross‐phenotype effects of rare variants in longitudinal studies of complex traits

Abstract

Many gene mapping studies of complex traits have identified genes or variants that influence multiple phenotypes. With the advent of next-generation sequencing technology, there has been substantial interest in identifying rare variants in genes that possess cross-phenotype effects. In the presence of such effects, modeling both the phenotypes and rare variants collectively using multivariate models can achieve higher statistical power compared to univariate methods that either model each phenotype separately or perform separate tests for each variant. Several studies collect phenotypic data over time and using such longitudinal data can further increase the power to detect genetic associations. Although rare-variant approaches exist for testing cross-phenotype effects at a single time point, there is no analogous method for performing such analyses using longitudinal outcomes. In order to fill this important gap, we propose an extension of Gene Association with Multiple Traits (GAMuT) test, a method for cross-phenotype analysis of rare variants using a framework based on the distance covariance. The approach allows for both binary and continuous phenotypes and can also adjust for covariates. Our simple adjustment to the GAMuT test allows it to handle longitudinal data and to gain power by exploiting temporal correlation. The approach is computationally efficient and applicable on a genome-wide scale due to the use of a closed-form test whose significance can be evaluated analytically. We use simulated data to demonstrate that our method has favorable power over competing approaches and also apply our approach to exome chip data from the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy.

Compositional Data Analysis using Kernels in Mass Cytometry Data

“…In this article, we have shown the ability of kernel machines to have high power for testing for compositional associations with clinical outcomes, which mirrors its success in other settings (e.g., Wu et al (2011);Rudra et al (2018)). Nevertheless, because the methodology operates at the level of samples and not individual features, one criticism is its interpretability.…”

The eigen higher criticism and eigen Berk–Jones tests for multiple trait association studies based on GWAS summary statistics

“…However, such single‐trait analyses have been found to be less powerful (Zhu et al, 2015), especially for the traits that are weakly associated with the given SNP (Luo et al, 2020). To boost statistical power, methods for jointly analyzing multiple traits in a unified framework have been proposed (Galesloot et al, 2014; Maier et al, 2015; Rudra et al, 2018), which can be summarized as multivariate methods, univariate methods, and data reduction methods (Aschard et al, 2014).…”