2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing domain-general theories of perceptual awareness with auditory brain responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, a later P3b response was also larger for cases with detected compared with undetected changes. These N1 and P3b modulations may reflect perceptual awareness of the change and subsequent memory updating or other cognitive consequences of awareness, respectively . Another study by the same group used a different set of recognizable sounds and unrecognizable versions of the sounds but found no N1 modulation for either type of sound .…”
Section: Understanding Processing Of Realistic Auditory Scenesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, a later P3b response was also larger for cases with detected compared with undetected changes. These N1 and P3b modulations may reflect perceptual awareness of the change and subsequent memory updating or other cognitive consequences of awareness, respectively . Another study by the same group used a different set of recognizable sounds and unrecognizable versions of the sounds but found no N1 modulation for either type of sound .…”
Section: Understanding Processing Of Realistic Auditory Scenesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A recent study, however, provided evidence that rhythmic brain activity is indeed important for auditory segregation of tone patterns (for additional commentary, see Ref. ). They used rhythmic patterns of transcranial electrical current stimulation directed through both auditory cortices that was either in phase or out of phase with an isochronous pattern of target tones embedded in background noise.…”
Section: Higher‐level Aspects Of Auditory Scene Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, animal models (in addition to human intracranial recordings and high-field fMRI [270]) might help to determine whether the putatively awareness-related surface-negative responses in AC, which correspond well with similar negativities in vision [25], reflect recurrent processing ( posited by several models as a critical processing mode for conscious perception [35,36,271]) either within auditory association cortex or between it and other brain areas. While this is suggested by their latency and by the fact that similar negativities in monkeys arise from superficial cortical layers [272], more work is needed, particularly in establishing NCC A experiments in non-human primates.…”
Section: Toward a Comprehensive Framework For Conscious Auditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the relative paucity of NCC studies conducted outside the context of vision, such models are necessarily based on conscious visual experience and its putative neural correlates [10,24]. On the other hand, it is rarely explicitly acknowledged that such models might not apply in other modalities, making the auditory system an ideal test bed with which to examine such models [14,25].(a) Global-workspace theoryOne prominent neurally based model of conscious perception is global-workspace theory, or GWT [35]. Based on an earlier, exclusively cognitive theory [15], GWT posits that in order for sensory information to enter consciousness, it must be made available to a host of disparate cognitive systems (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results ( Figure 1C) showed that it took less time for participants to notice the target sounds when the electrical current was delivered in phase with the sounds, suggesting that aligning the phase of brain activity with a stimulus facilitates sound segregation and target-in-noise detection. Interestingly, the precise phases of current that best facilitated detection corresponded to delays similar to that of brain responses correlated with sound segregation [14] and conscious auditory perception more generally [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%