2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0591-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Event Discrimination over Broad Regions using the Historical Borovoye Observatory Explosion Dataset

Abstract: We test the performance of high-frequency regional P/S discriminants to differentiate between earthquakes and explosions at test sites and over broad regions using a historical dataset of explosions recorded at the Borovoye observatory in Kazakhstan. We compare these explosions to modern recordings of earthquakes at the same location. We then evaluate the separation of the two types of events using the raw measurements and those where the amplitudes are corrected for 1-D and 2-D attenuation structure. We find … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can quantify the separation of the earthquake and explosion populations through the Mahalanobis distance (used in Hartse et al, 1998;Pasyanos et al, 2012a), a measure of separation of the means divided by a sum of the variances. A larger Mahalanobis distance indicates that the populations are more cleanly separated, giving better earthquake/explosion discrimination.…”
Section: Earthquake-explosion Discrimination and Event Analysis At Ntsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can quantify the separation of the earthquake and explosion populations through the Mahalanobis distance (used in Hartse et al, 1998;Pasyanos et al, 2012a), a measure of separation of the means divided by a sum of the variances. A larger Mahalanobis distance indicates that the populations are more cleanly separated, giving better earthquake/explosion discrimination.…”
Section: Earthquake-explosion Discrimination and Event Analysis At Ntsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of papers, we have developed the methodology using the Lg phase (Pasyanos et al, 2009a), extended the method to use amplitudes of the Pn, Pg, Sn, and Lg in a multiphase inversion method (Pasyanos et al, 2009b), then used the model in a series of applications including seismic discrimination between earthquakes and explosions (Pasyanos and Walter, 2009;Pasyanos et al, 2012a), moment magnitude estimation (Pasyanos, 2010), and in strong ground motion predictions for seismic hazard (Pasyanos, 2011). In a further extension of the model, we used the attenuation model in the analysis of the yield and depth of the 2006 and 2009 DPRK nuclear tests (Pasyanos et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deglitched version is shown in red, in comparison with the glitched record shown in black. The quality of the deglitched data is high enough to enable detailed spectral analysis, and evaluation of methods of discrimination between earthquakes and explosions [24].…”
Section: Technical Approach To Deglitchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 15 shows the measured three-component P/S ratios plotted against epicentral distance. In cases where high frequencies are significantly attenuated, there can be a distance dependence in the ratio and it may then be useful to make a correction to the observed spectral ratio (as done for example by Kim et al, 1997;Hartse et al, 1998;Walter and Taylor 2001;Taylor et al, 2002;Pasyanos and Walter 2009;and Pasyanos et al, 2012), to account for the fact that the denominator (based on S-wave data) may attenuate with distance differently from the numerator (based on P), but we have not made a correction for distance, because earthquakes and explosions in the 150-550 km distance range show no clear distance dependence of the ratios, and the training set data have comparable distance ranges and are tightly distributed. The 12 earthquake events have an average epicentral Figure 12.…”
Section: Classification Of Known Underground Nuclear Tests and The CLmentioning
confidence: 99%