2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2016.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for causality among globalization, institution and financial development: Further evidence from three economic blocs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this line, Odhiambo (2009) Demetriades and Hussein (1996) The seminal argument proposed by Mishkin (2009) is a theoretical in nature but it lacks empirical scrutiny. In connection to the Mishkin's (2009) hypothesis linking the relationship between globalization and financial development through the channel of institutional quality, few empirical studies have been emerged to understand the nexus between two (La Porta et al 1997, Huang and Temple 2005, García 2011, Falahaty and Law 2012, Chen and Emile 2013, Law et al 2015, Kandil et al 2015, Luo et al 2016, Muye and Muye 2017, Shahbaz et al 2018a. La Porta et al (1997) in their empirical study found that trade openness (proxy for globalization) promotes financial development for richer economies, but not for poorer economies.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this line, Odhiambo (2009) Demetriades and Hussein (1996) The seminal argument proposed by Mishkin (2009) is a theoretical in nature but it lacks empirical scrutiny. In connection to the Mishkin's (2009) hypothesis linking the relationship between globalization and financial development through the channel of institutional quality, few empirical studies have been emerged to understand the nexus between two (La Porta et al 1997, Huang and Temple 2005, García 2011, Falahaty and Law 2012, Chen and Emile 2013, Law et al 2015, Kandil et al 2015, Luo et al 2016, Muye and Muye 2017, Shahbaz et al 2018a. La Porta et al (1997) in their empirical study found that trade openness (proxy for globalization) promotes financial development for richer economies, but not for poorer economies.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently,Luo et al (2016) using their time series analysis, found that trade and financial openness have beneficial effects on financial efficiency but also found its adverse effects on the size of financial development in China Muye and Muye (2017). using the time series framework, also found the positive long-run relationship between globalization and financial development for the BRICS region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Luo, Zhang and Zhu (2016) in China, using time series analysis, found that commercial and financial openness had valuable effects on financial performance but also negative effects on the size of financial development. Muye and Muye (2017), also found positive long-run relationship between globalization and financial development for the BRICS countries, using the time series data.…”
Section: Literatur Reviewmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Researchers hypothesis that interest groups politically impose some bindings on the dominant firms to preserve their competitive position in the market (Mishkin, 2009; R. G. Rajan & Zingales, 2003). But with the development of trade openness and capital flow, FD can make the level playing field for all firms (Muye & Muye, 2017). Thus, financial development will have positive effects on cross-country transactions.…”
Section: Effect Of Fdi To Develop the Existing Financial Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%