2008
DOI: 10.1002/for.1060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for Granger (non‐)causality in a time‐varying coefficient VAR model

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we are able to define at each time step the probability of a transfer through every possible channels. A multivariate extension of the causal time varying VAR approach of [ 32 ] could also be considered as an alternative to this procedure. Nevertheless, our approach is model free and is able to treat more complex transition patterns between regimes compared to the single smooth transition considered in [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodology: Multichannel Markov Switching Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we are able to define at each time step the probability of a transfer through every possible channels. A multivariate extension of the causal time varying VAR approach of [ 32 ] could also be considered as an alternative to this procedure. Nevertheless, our approach is model free and is able to treat more complex transition patterns between regimes compared to the single smooth transition considered in [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodology: Multichannel Markov Switching Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. For the identification of the transition (γ) and location (δ) parameters, a grid search procedure was employed following relevant studies (i.e., Holt and Craig, 2006;Christopoulos and Leon-Ledesma, 2008;Balagtas and Holt, 2009) as the log likelihood function of a transition model may have many local maxima (Van Dijk et al, 2002). Specifically, the value of γ was estimated over the range [0.1, 4.0] while that for δ over [0.1, 1] using an 0.01 increment during the grid search for both parameters.…”
Section: Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the estimating the translog-transition production function using the above linearized specification of irrigation water effectiveness function, we can test the null hypothesis of linearity H : ϑ 3 = ϑ 4 = ϑ 5 = ϑ 6 = ϑ 7 = ϑ 8 = 0 using a standard F -test (the F -version of the linearity test performs better in small samples; see for example Luukkonen et al, (1998) and Christopoulos and Leon-Ledesma (2008). If the null hypothesis of linearity is rejected against the alternative, then we proceed to the econometric estimation of the translog-transition production function using the specification in (11) for the irrigation water effectiveness function.…”
Section: A Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is recommended for the investigation of price developments in the pre-crisis period, since the examination of financial markets during the crisis or in the post-crisis period requires the identification of models specifically tailored for the situation, or requires creation of new models (Christopoulus and Leon-Ledesma 2008;Gelper and Croux 2007;Rublikova 2003;Dufour and Jouini 2006). In the event of no cointegration between the variables, clearly Granger causality tests should be prioritised and regression equations must be adjusted simultaneously according to the peculiarities of the problem addressed (equations 1 and 2).…”
Section: Lnp C C Lnpmentioning
confidence: 99%