1978
DOI: 10.2307/1913830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for Higher Order Serial Correlation in Regression Equations when the Regressors Include Lagged Dependent Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
207
0
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 582 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
207
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case, the normality assumption is rejected, and explains the rejection of the joint test for normality for the VAR models with food prices and metal prices at the standard levels of significance. Note: see Godfrey (1978), White (1980) and Doornik and Hansen (1994) for test details. p -values are presented in square brackets.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, the normality assumption is rejected, and explains the rejection of the joint test for normality for the VAR models with food prices and metal prices at the standard levels of significance. Note: see Godfrey (1978), White (1980) and Doornik and Hansen (1994) for test details. p -values are presented in square brackets.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology used in this chapter for misspecification testing follows Godfrey (1988) and Shukur (2002). To test for autocorrelation, we apply the F-version of the Breusch (1978) and Godfrey (1978) test. We use White (1980) test (including cross products of the explanatory variables) to test for heteroscedasticity and Ramsey's (1969) RESET test to test for functional misspecification (Ramsey, 1969).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Godfrey 1988). Generalisations to test Arma(p, q) vs Arma(p + k, q) for k > 1 are straightforward, since they only involve higher order (circulant) autocovariances of f t , as in Godfrey (1978b). Similarly, it is easy to show that Arma(p + k, q) and Arma(p, q + k) multiplicative alternatives are also locally equivalent.…”
Section: Testing For Serial Correlation In Univariate Observable Procmentioning
confidence: 99%