2004
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/91.1.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for multimodality with dependent data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the presence of sudden changes or jumps in time-series, which may be indicative of a phase transition, the frequency distribution of key population variables should be multimodal (Scheffer & Carpenter 2003). In this study, we tested whether the analysed time series of pollock recruitment followed a multimodal distribution using an extended application of the Silverman test (Chan & Tong 2004). To increase the power of the test we adopted the Hall & York (2001) adjustment under the null hypothesis of unimodality (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the presence of sudden changes or jumps in time-series, which may be indicative of a phase transition, the frequency distribution of key population variables should be multimodal (Scheffer & Carpenter 2003). In this study, we tested whether the analysed time series of pollock recruitment followed a multimodal distribution using an extended application of the Silverman test (Chan & Tong 2004). To increase the power of the test we adopted the Hall & York (2001) adjustment under the null hypothesis of unimodality (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The null hypothesis of unimodality is rejected (at 0.05 significance level) up to the year 1995. The reported p-values were computed based on the Silverman test assuming independent and identically distributed data, with an adjustment due to Hall & York (2001) and 1000 bootstrap replications; these p-values were almost identical under the assumption that the data were generated from a first-order or second-order Markov process (Chan & Tong 2004). Also shown, on the right side of the plot, is the frequency distribution of the entire (i.e.…”
Section: Terminology Preamble: Phase and Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansen (1999) proposed using an empirical likelihood estimator of the Markov transition probability but did not prove that the resulting version of the MB is consistent or provides asymptotic refinements. Chan and Tong (1998) proposed using the MB in a test for multimodality in the distribution of dependent data. Paparoditis and Politis (2001) proposed estimating the Markov transition probability by resampling the data in a suitable way.…”
Section: The Bootstrap For Markov Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [9] for a survey of classical results in the area. Many natural structural assumptions have been considered in statistics and learning theory, such as monotonicity [10,41,42,50], monotone hazard rate [15,20,46], unimodality [39,69,82], convexity and concavity [43,55], logconcavity [6,37,81], k-modality [7,13,40], smoothness [12,35,36,53], and mixtures of structured distributions [3, 5, 19, 21-26, 31-33, 38, 51, 64, 70, 80]. The reader is referred to [28,65] for a more extensive review of this vast literature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%