2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for Neuropsychological Endophenotypes in Siblings Discordant for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Abstract: Background: Neurocognitive deficits associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) might be useful intermediate endophenotypes for determining specific genetic pathways that contribute to ADHD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
130
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
19
130
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 The phenotype consists of extreme manifestations of continuous traits, including hyperactivity, impulsivity, and dysfunction in executive and self-regulatory skills that involve working memory, temporal organization, planning, organizing, maintaining focus, effort and motivation. 4,5 Brain studies of patients with ADHD have shown abnormalities in frontal-striatal and cerebellar circuitry. 6,7 Although dopaminergic and noradrenergic medications are clinically effective, 8 animal models provide support for the involvement of additional molecular pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 The phenotype consists of extreme manifestations of continuous traits, including hyperactivity, impulsivity, and dysfunction in executive and self-regulatory skills that involve working memory, temporal organization, planning, organizing, maintaining focus, effort and motivation. 4,5 Brain studies of patients with ADHD have shown abnormalities in frontal-striatal and cerebellar circuitry. 6,7 Although dopaminergic and noradrenergic medications are clinically effective, 8 animal models provide support for the involvement of additional molecular pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most robust cognitive markers, affecting a large proportion of patients across different tasks and settings, is increased intraindividual reaction time variability (RTV e.g., Kalff et al, 2003;Klein et al, 2006;Scheres et al, 2001;van Meel et al, 2005). Indeed, Bidwell et al, (2007) have shown that RTV is also increased in unaffected dizygotic twins of children with ADHD when compared to control twinpairs, while further evidence for the heritability of this marker comes from the molecular genetics research of Bellgrove and colleagues (Bellgrove et al, 2005) who report an association between the dopamine transporter gene and RTV in ADHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review concluded that, on the basis of existing data, one of the most robust motivational markers in ADHD was a preference for smaller sooner (SS) over larger later (LL) rewards (Luman, Oosterlaan, & Sergeant, 2005). This pattern of choice has been shown in most (e.g., Antrop et al, 2006;Bitsakou, Psychogiou, Thompson, & Sonuga-Barke, 2009;Dalen, SonugaBarke, & Remington, 2004;Hoerger & Mace, 2006;Kuntsi, Oosterlaan, & Stevenson, 2001;Schweitzer & Sulzer-Azaroff, 1995;Solanto et al, 2001;Sonuga-Barke, Taylor, Sembi, & Smith, 1992), but not all (Bidwell, Willcutt, DeFries, & Pennington, 2007;Scheres et al, 2006;Solanto et al, 2007) studies of ADHD using SS versus LL choice paradigms. A recent meta-analysis reported a pooled effect size for case-control differences of a similar magnitude to those seen for executive function measures .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%