2009
DOI: 10.1080/07060660909507601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for resistance to smut diseases of barley, oats and wheat in western Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From a biological or evolutionary point of view, one has to assume that conservation of this cluster serves a distinct purpose, even though evidence to that effect is still lacking. Two closely related plant pathogens, Sporisorium reilianum and Ustilago hordei, lack such a cluster (23; J. Schirawski, R. Kahmann, and G. Bakkeren, personal communication) but are much less prevalent than U. maydis (16). This could indicate that production of glycolipids with antibiotic activity does extend the ecological niche and enhance the ability to reproduce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From a biological or evolutionary point of view, one has to assume that conservation of this cluster serves a distinct purpose, even though evidence to that effect is still lacking. Two closely related plant pathogens, Sporisorium reilianum and Ustilago hordei, lack such a cluster (23; J. Schirawski, R. Kahmann, and G. Bakkeren, personal communication) but are much less prevalent than U. maydis (16). This could indicate that production of glycolipids with antibiotic activity does extend the ecological niche and enhance the ability to reproduce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Common root rot was assessed in single‐row plots in the root rot screening nursery at AAFC Lacombe. Loose smut assessment was done in the field by inoculation using the air‐brush technique developed by Wolfe (1993) and outlined in Menzies et al (2009). The inoculated heads were harvested and the seed was grown out in growth rooms during the following winter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These evaluations were done twice, once in 2008 and again in 2012. Covered smut was evaluated in field nurseries at Lacombe in 2009 and again in 2012, by vacuum infiltration of teliospores under the hull of the seed, as originally reported by Fischer and Holton (1957) and Nielsen (1976) and outlined in Menzies et al (2009), with inoculum provided by Dr. J. Menzies, AAFC Morden Research and Development Centre.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canada ranks second after the European Union in durum wheat production with an average of 4.4 million tonnes each year (International Grain Council; http://www.igc.int/en/default.aspx ). Most of the durum wheat cultivars registered for production on the Canadian prairies are susceptible to many races of the loose smut pathogen [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%