2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2265488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for Structural Breaks in Correlations: Does it Improve Value-at-Risk Forecasting?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, Xing et al (2012) demonstrated that the credit rating transitions' structural breaks can be well captured by their proposed model, and they showed that structural breaks in credit rating dynamics were different by industries. Berens et al (2015) showed that the performances of correlation models such as the constant conditional correlation (CCC) model and the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model can be improved by taking into consideration structural breaks in asset comovements.…”
Section: Recent Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Xing et al (2012) demonstrated that the credit rating transitions' structural breaks can be well captured by their proposed model, and they showed that structural breaks in credit rating dynamics were different by industries. Berens et al (2015) showed that the performances of correlation models such as the constant conditional correlation (CCC) model and the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model can be improved by taking into consideration structural breaks in asset comovements.…”
Section: Recent Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an application of this test to Value-at-Risk forecasts (Berens et al, 2013) it is seen that this proposed test might indeed be useful in practical situations. That is, it might be a promising approach to combine the well-known CCC (constant conditional correlation) and DCC (dynamic conditional correlation) model with this test for structural breaks in correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While our focus here is on a specific application, the problem has wide applicability. For example, Stoehr et al (2020) examine changes in the covariance structure of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data, where a failure to satisfy stationarity assumptions can significantly contaminate any analysis, while Wied et al (2013) and Berens et al (2015) examine how changes in the covariance of financial data can be used to improve stock portfolio optimisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%