2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing German shepherd puppies to assess their chances of certification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, many pertinent research questions could not be addressed due to the small number of samples available for moderator analyses. For example, many dog personality studies focus on how well an earlier behavioral test can predict later ‘success’ or certification in a training program but ‘success’ is usually not well-defined (i.e., usually reported as a yes/no outcome) [97]. Attempts at defining explicit domains of success/failure (e.g., quantitative descriptions of behavior) could enable potential inclusion of these studies in future meta-analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many pertinent research questions could not be addressed due to the small number of samples available for moderator analyses. For example, many dog personality studies focus on how well an earlier behavioral test can predict later ‘success’ or certification in a training program but ‘success’ is usually not well-defined (i.e., usually reported as a yes/no outcome) [97]. Attempts at defining explicit domains of success/failure (e.g., quantitative descriptions of behavior) could enable potential inclusion of these studies in future meta-analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devoted efforts of researchers working on dogs provided several tools for characterising individual behaviour (e.g., Sheppard & Mills, 2002;Hsu & Serpell, 2003;Mirkó et al, 2012), identified breed (genetic) differences (e.g., Wilsson & Sundgren, 1997a,b;Svartberg, 2002Svartberg, , 2006Strandberg et al, 2005;Turcsán et al, 2011), uncovered some gene polymorphisms associated with personality traits (e.g., Héjjas et al, 2007b;Takeuchi et al, 2009a,b;Konno et al, 2011), and studied the effect of development or stability of the behaviour characteristics over an extended period of time (e.g., Wilsson & Sundgren, 1998;Slabbert & Odendaal, 1999;Svobodová et al, 2008). Thus, understanding function and mechanisms of dog personality has a wide range of practical applications, including significant influence on the dog-human bond, dog welfare, and even human health.…”
Section: The Study Of Individualitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The predictive power of the puppy test applied by the Czech Law Enforcement Canine Breeding Facility is also reliable for predicting future service ability and is used for selecting dogs at the age of 7 weeks. Trainers look for relatively heavy dogs with good retrieving skills and those that like to chase a rug but display no noise phobia (Svobodová et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Predictive Significance Of Puppy Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the commonly used tests are often undocumented (e.g., UK military; Rooney et al, 2003). Some are published, including some of the tests used for guide dogs (Serpell and Hsu, 2001;Asher et al, 2013), police dogs (Slabbert and Odendaal, 1999;Svobodová et al, 2008), general service dogs (Wilsson and Sundgren, 1997), improvised explosives devices (IED) detection , and military dogs (Haverbeke et al, 2009;Sinn et al, 2010). Predictive testing is fraught with difficulties, and the extent to which this is objectively assessed is variable.…”
Section: Testing For Fearful Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many agencies use a suite of "puppy tests" which try to predict fearfulness among other traits. Tests for fear of loud noises include using weights dropped in buckets (Murphree and Dykman, 1965) or on tables (Svobodová et al, 2008), whistles (Pfaffenberger and Scott, 1976), metal cans (Fisher and Volhard, 1985), party poppers (Hoffmann et al, 1995), simulated thunderstorms (Seksel et al, 1999), clapping (Champness, 1996), or pistols (Slabbert and Odendaal, 1999). Tests may examine fear of novel people (e.g., Murphree and Dykman, 1965;Slabbert and Odendaal, 1999); novel objects, including umbrellas (Hoffmann et al, 1995), hair driers (Seksel et al, 1999), novel environments (e.g., open stairs [Goddard and Beilharz, 1986]), and unstable surfaces.…”
Section: Reliance On Testing Puppiesmentioning
confidence: 99%