2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing heated flint palaeodose protocols using dose recovery procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up until now, the estimation of an equivalent dose (DE) using the thermoluminescence (TL) signal is performed mainly by multiple-aliquot additive dose (MAAD) protocols. However, the MAAD approach shows numerous disadvantages, which are mainly associated with the large quantity of the datable material needed to obtain a DE estimate, the lack of validation tests (e.g., dose recovery tests [1]), and complications in appropriately extrapolating a derived TL growth curve to the dose axis, as well as the difficulty of reproducing the derived TL signals of a given laboratory dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until now, the estimation of an equivalent dose (DE) using the thermoluminescence (TL) signal is performed mainly by multiple-aliquot additive dose (MAAD) protocols. However, the MAAD approach shows numerous disadvantages, which are mainly associated with the large quantity of the datable material needed to obtain a DE estimate, the lack of validation tests (e.g., dose recovery tests [1]), and complications in appropriately extrapolating a derived TL growth curve to the dose axis, as well as the difficulty of reproducing the derived TL signals of a given laboratory dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%