2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing high resolution magnetic susceptibility and gamma radiation methods in the Cenomanian–Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) GSSP and near-by coeval section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of these processes, short-term Milankovitch bands (Earth's obliquity and precession) are not as well developed in older rocks as they are in younger sequences. However, it is now clear that time-series analysis of cyclic geophysical (i.e., χ and gamma ray spectroscopy; Ellwood et al, 2013;2017) and geochemical data sets are controlled by global processes driven by climate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of these processes, short-term Milankovitch bands (Earth's obliquity and precession) are not as well developed in older rocks as they are in younger sequences. However, it is now clear that time-series analysis of cyclic geophysical (i.e., χ and gamma ray spectroscopy; Ellwood et al, 2013;2017) and geochemical data sets are controlled by global processes driven by climate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic susceptibility in marine carbonate successions is a function of detrital and aeolian mineral concentration controlled by fluctuations in influx of terrestrial lithogenic (siliciclastic) material which responds both to changes in climate and continental weathering and sea level fluctuations (Ellwood et al, 2000(Ellwood et al, , 2013. Magnetic susceptibility samples were taken at intervals of approximately 0.5-1 m from the Guandao section and were measured with the susceptibility bridge at Louisiana State University, using the techniques described in Ellwood et al (2013).…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic susceptibility samples were taken at intervals of approximately 0.5-1 m from the Guandao section and were measured with the susceptibility bridge at Louisiana State University, using the techniques described in Ellwood et al (2013).…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although magnetic-reversal stratigraphy and magneticsusceptibility correlations offer higher-resolution correlation (finer zonal subdivisions) than Late Triassic conodont and ammoniod biostratigraphy (cf. Hounslow and Muttoni 2010;Ellwood et al 2000Ellwood et al , 2013 there is still uncertainty on how the marine record correlates with the terrestrial NB-MPTS, which lacks biostratigraphically significant fossils (Ogg et al 2014). An alternative ''short Tuvalian'' age model for the NB-MPTS would place the entire Zhuganpo and Wayao magnetic reversal record prior to the onset of the Newark Basin MPTS, which would imply drowning near the beginning of the Carnian and deep-marine deposition spanning the Julian and basal Tuvalian substages (Yang et al in review).…”
Section: Paleomagnetic-reversal and Magnetic-susceptibility Constrainmentioning
confidence: 99%