2021
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing hypotheses of marsupial brain size variation using phylogenetic multiple imputations and a Bayesian comparative framework

Abstract: Considerable controversy exists about which hypotheses and variables best explain mammalian brain size variation. We use a new, high-coverage dataset of marsupial brain and body sizes, and the first phylogenetically imputed full datasets of 16 predictor variables, to model the prevalent hypotheses explaining brain size evolution using phylogenetically corrected Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects modelling. Despite this comprehensive analysis, litter size emerges as the only significant predictor. Marsup… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We follow recent studies (e.g. [77]) in addressing this by adding a small value to branch lengths (0.5my) and then adjusting the branch lengths to ensure the tree remains ultrametric using the force.ultrametric function in the R package 'phytools' [57]. The impact of polytomies in most comparative methods is still poorly understood, but arbitrarily resolving them tends to lead to inflation of rates of phenotypic evolution [78].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow recent studies (e.g. [77]) in addressing this by adding a small value to branch lengths (0.5my) and then adjusting the branch lengths to ensure the tree remains ultrametric using the force.ultrametric function in the R package 'phytools' [57]. The impact of polytomies in most comparative methods is still poorly understood, but arbitrarily resolving them tends to lead to inflation of rates of phenotypic evolution [78].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals long thought of as "notably less intelligent" and relatively "simple" (Britannica, 2021) have turned out to be smart (Todorov et al, 2021), fast (Garland et al, 1988), and savvy (this study). Where does this leave the notion that introduced species, particularly predators, are a categorical threat?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These findings are therefore also fully consistent with the parental provisioning hypothesis. In a recent analysis of marsupial brain size variation, Todorov et al [101] found that the only variable with explanatory value was litter size, which, given that size at birth and growth rates are rather uniform in this lineage, is consistent with the parental provisioning hypothesis.…”
Section: Provisioning and Brain Size: Comparative Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%