1996
DOI: 10.2307/1392426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Identifiability of Cointegrating Vectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of linear identifying restrictions requires the assumption that we have some minimal knowledge of the cointegrating space such that we know the appropriate restrictions to apply (this same point is made in Mellander et al, 1992). In various papers such as Boswijk (1996), Luukkonen et al (1999), and Strachan (2003), however, examples of seemingly sensible restrictions of this form are shown, in fact, to be invalid.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of linear identifying restrictions requires the assumption that we have some minimal knowledge of the cointegrating space such that we know the appropriate restrictions to apply (this same point is made in Mellander et al, 1992). In various papers such as Boswijk (1996), Luukkonen et al (1999), and Strachan (2003), however, examples of seemingly sensible restrictions of this form are shown, in fact, to be invalid.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a suitable rearrangement of the variables it can always be ensured that the normalization ]~' = [It : ~ig-~)] is possible. Test procedures exist for checking the normalization empirically if a proper ordering of the variables is not known a priori (Boswijk, 1996;Saikkonen, 1999).…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ÿrst issue with linear identifying restrictions is the speciÿcation of c. The practical problems in classical analysis of incorrectly selecting c are discussed in Boswijk (1996) and Luukkonen et al (1999) and in Bayesian analysis by Strachan (2003). Assuming known c, the pathologies and complicating features (for analysis) of the posterior for ÿ 2 with a at prior, such as multimodality, nonexistence of moments and (under some speciÿcations) non-integrability of the posterior have been detailed by KVD and Bauwens and Lubrano (1996).…”
Section: Linear Restrictions and The Cointegrating Spacementioning
confidence: 99%