2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing inter‐observer reliability of the Transition Analysis aging method on the William M. Bass forensic skeletal collection

Abstract: These results support the use of the TA method by researchers of varying experience levels. Further, they validate its use on forensic cases, given the low error overall.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although skeletal variation increases between 45 and 75 years of age, it appears to decrease after this time, as reflected in a narrowing of predicted age intervals (Getz, 2017; Jooste et al, 2016; Maaranen & Buckberry, 2018; Milner & Boldsen, 2012c)4. Additionally, there appears to be acceptably low inter‐observer error in most trait scores (Fojas et al, 2018; Jooste et al, 2016), which indicates that results can be reliably compared among observers. Furthermore, two paleodemographic applications of the method to archaeological samples from Postclassic Cholula and Contact‐Period Xochimilco Mexico (Bullock et al, 2013) and Late Classic Copan in Honduras (Storey, 2007) demonstrated the utility of the method for improving our assessment of past populations.…”
Section: Transition Analysis As a Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although skeletal variation increases between 45 and 75 years of age, it appears to decrease after this time, as reflected in a narrowing of predicted age intervals (Getz, 2017; Jooste et al, 2016; Maaranen & Buckberry, 2018; Milner & Boldsen, 2012c)4. Additionally, there appears to be acceptably low inter‐observer error in most trait scores (Fojas et al, 2018; Jooste et al, 2016), which indicates that results can be reliably compared among observers. Furthermore, two paleodemographic applications of the method to archaeological samples from Postclassic Cholula and Contact‐Period Xochimilco Mexico (Bullock et al, 2013) and Late Classic Copan in Honduras (Storey, 2007) demonstrated the utility of the method for improving our assessment of past populations.…”
Section: Transition Analysis As a Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding indicates that the ad hoc correction for trait correlations is not entirely successful. Applications to modern documented samples also show that TA age ranges are often too broad to be useful and point estimates exhibit systematic age‐estimation bias (i.e., overestimation of age in young adults, and increasing underestimation of age in older adults) (Fojas et al, 2018; Getz, 2017; Jooste et al, 2016; Milner & Boldsen, 2012c). This bias primarily results from the failure of change in the cranial sutures and pelvic joints to keep pace with chronological age after around age 50 (Milner & Boldsen, 2012c; Saunders, Fitzgerald, Rogers, Dudar, & McKillop, 1992).…”
Section: Transition Analysis As a Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The researchers validated this method: the inter‐observer error percentage rates were low (0.80–3.09), and the accurate classifications ranged from 78% to 90.6%. [44] As seen in FA‐HEP level 2, IRR calculations were often used to assess the reliability of inter‐expert conclusions (e.g., [33]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within many level 2 forensic anthropology publications, interrater reliability (IRR) measures were used in order to understand the reliability of researcher data (see [33,34]). Cohen's Kappa, Fleiss' Kappa, and Krippendorf's Alpha are only a few examples of IRR calculations [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Level 2 Inter-expert Reliability Of Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%