2002
DOI: 10.1257/00028280260344524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Intertemporal Substitution, Implicit Contracts, and Hours Restriction Models of the Labor Market Using Micro Data

Abstract: We present new tests of three theories of the labor market: intertemporal substitution, hours restrictions, and implicit contracts. The intertemporal substitution test we implement is an exclusion test robust to many specification errors and we consistently reject this model. We model hours restrictions as part of an endogenous switching model. We compare the implicit probit equation to an unrestricted probit equation for unemployment and reject the hours restriction model. For the implicit contracts model, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Just as there are many reasons that my point estimates of the elasticity of employment 13 I also estimate the elasticity of labor supply by drawing six consecutive weeks of data for each village, because consecutive weeks is more closely analogous to the concept measured in cross sectional data. The elasticities from estimates using cross sectional data are 0.39 (without covariates) and 0.37 (with covariates).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as there are many reasons that my point estimates of the elasticity of employment 13 I also estimate the elasticity of labor supply by drawing six consecutive weeks of data for each village, because consecutive weeks is more closely analogous to the concept measured in cross sectional data. The elasticities from estimates using cross sectional data are 0.39 (without covariates) and 0.37 (with covariates).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictions of the model are assessed by comparing the generated standard deviations and cross-correlations between output and the other variables with corresponding statistics from US data. 36 Par- 34 The estimates of interest are robust to di¤erent estimation methods (eg. Hildreth-Lu and maximum likelihood grid search procedures).…”
Section: Model Vs Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling for productivity growth, the response of hours worked to wage changes and income shocks is milder than predicted by traditional theories. For example, Ham and Reilly (2002) point to this shortcoming of the theoretical literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%