Testing measurement properties of two EQ-5D youth versions and KIDSCREEN-10 in China

Wang, Pei; Sun, Yifeng; Yang, Zhihao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Wu, Bin; Luo, Nan

doi:10.1007/s10198-021-01307-y

Cited by 23 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The redistribution of scores from the Y-3L to the Y-5L showed few inconsistencies across dimensions (4-8%) and was similar to the comparison of versions in China 9,10 . The discriminatory power of the dimensions improved when moving from the Y-3L to the Y-5L with retention of evenness of the distribution of the responses.…”

Section: Preprintssupporting

confidence: 69%

“…A head-to-head comparison of the Y-5L and Y-3L in paediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis, 8-17 years, showed a low inconsistency in responses between the two measures, a reduction in the ceiling effect and good test-rest agreement 9 . The Y-5L had similar moderate correlations to the Kidscreen in children with and without short-sightedness and overweight 10 . There is further evidence that the Y-5L is feasible to use with children receiving psychiatric care 11 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 75%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparing Measurement Properties of the English EQ-5D-Y Three-Level Version with the Five-Level Version in South Africa

Verstraete¹,

Amien²,

Scott³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the EQ-5D-Y-3L (Y-3L) and the expanded five level version, the EQ-5D-Y-5L (Y-5L). Methods: Children/adolescents with an acute or chronic health condition and from the general population completed the Y-5L and Y-3L self-report questionnaires. Performance of the Y-5L and Y-3L was determined by comparing feasibility, redistribution of dimension responses, discriminatory power, validity, and test-retest reliability. Results. Five hundred and fifty children/adolescents completed baseline measures and 173 completed repeat measures. The ceiling effect decreased by 15% from the Y-3L to Y-5L. Informativity of dimensions improved by 0.094 on the Y-5L. There was a range of 4-9% inconsistent responses moving from the Y-3L to Y-5L. Convergent validity of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Y-3L, Y-5L dimensions was similar, weak to moderate (rs range: 0.18 – 0.38) but similar and strong on paired Y-3L and Y-5L dimensions: Kendall Tau B (range 0.69 – 0.80) and Gamma (range 0.92 – 0.98). The Y-5L and Y-3L showed moderate to substantial agreement for test-retest reliability across dimensions and VAS scores in stable chronic health conditions and fair agreement for the general population. Conclusion: The EQ-5D-Y-5L is a valid, reliable extension of the Y-3L for children/adolescents across health conditions and healthy children/adolescents. The expanded levels reduced the ceiling effect. The relative informativity of report across dimensions increased on the Y-5L compared to the Y-3L with retention of the evenness of reporting. The convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the Y-5L was comparable to the Y-3L.

show abstract

Section: Preprintssupporting

confidence: 69%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 75%

Comparing Measurement Properties of the English EQ-5D-Y Three-Level Version with the Five-Level Version in South Africa

Verstraete¹,

Amien²,

Scott³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After 2 years, we were able to identify 6 additional articles on this topic. 51,53,60,61,63,64 Despite this, there are only 2 studies on the psychometric evidence concerning EQ-5D-Y-5L reliability, 3 on validity, and a single study on responsiveness. In consequence, further research on this topic is urgently needed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-Y: A Systematic Review

Golicki¹,

Młyńczak²

2022

Value in Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The redistribution of scores from the Y-3L to the Y-5L showed few inconsistencies across dimensions (4%-8%) and was similar to the comparison of versions in China. 9,10 The discriminatory power of the dimensions improved when moving from the Y-3L to the Y-5L with retention of evenness of the distribution of the responses. Nevertheless, the distribution of responses is not as high as that observed in the adult 3L and 5L measures 4,5,20 with a lower selection of some problems on the Y-3L and some or a lot of problems on the Y-5L.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…9 The Y-5L had similar moderate correlations to the Kidscreen in children with and without short sightedness and overweight. 10 There is further evidence that the Y-5L is feasible to use with children receiving psychiatric care. 11 Nevertheless, these studies had modest sample sizes with an older mean age of respondent (13-15 years) possibly because of the wider patient age range of 8 to 17 years in participants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Measurement Properties of the English EQ-5D-Y 3-Level Version With the 5-Level Version in South Africa

Verstraete

Amien

Scott

2022

Value in Health Regional Issues

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Testing measurement properties of two EQ-5D youth versions and KIDSCREEN-10 in China

Cited by 23 publications

References 33 publications

Comparing Measurement Properties of the English EQ-5D-Y Three-Level Version with the Five-Level Version in South Africa

Comparing Measurement Properties of the English EQ-5D-Y Three-Level Version with the Five-Level Version in South Africa

Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-Y: A Systematic Review

Comparing Measurement Properties of the English EQ-5D-Y 3-Level Version With the 5-Level Version in South Africa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About