Testing models of justice and trust: A study of mediation in child dependency disputes

Ashford, José B.; Faith, Roger L.

doi:10.1093/swr/28.1.18

Cited by 13 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each participant was administered a survey instrument with 23 Likert-type items derived from previously researched items of justice, trust, and satisfaction (Ashford & Faith, 2004;Brockner & Siegel, 1996;Deutsch, 1985;Lind & Tyler, 1988;Thibaut & Walker, 1975;Tyler, 1989;Tyler & Degoey, 1996). An interviewer administered the instrument to the participants at either the court or at the parent's CPS office.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the Effects of Judicial Versus Child Protective Service Relationships on Parental Attitudes in the Juvenile Dependency Process

Ashford

2006

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the Effects of Judicial Versus Child Protective Service Relationships on Parental Attitudes in the Juvenile Dependency Process

Ashford

2006

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This is comparable to the average ES reported by Shaw. A field study by Ashford and Faith (2004) compared participants randomly assigned to a mediation (n = 124) with a pretrial conference (n = 76) condition. They reported a significant difference between the conditions on degree of settlement: An F ratio of 7.91 which, when expressed as an ES is .20.…”

Section: Benchmarking Mediator Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who is Best at Mediating a Social Conflict? Comparing Robots, Screens and Humans

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impacts of various mediation platforms on negotiation outcomes and perceptions are compared in this article. The mediator platforms contrasted were a (teleoperated) Telenoid robot, a human, and a computer screen. All of these platforms used the same script for process diagnosis, analysis, and advice on how to resolve an impasse in a simulated high-tech company de-merger negotiation. A fourth experimental condition consisted of a no-mediation control. More agreements and more integrative agreements were attained by the robotic platform than by the other types of mediator platforms and the control. Mediation via the Telenoid robot also produced more non-structured agreements, which consisted of decisions made outside of the scenario options. Negotiators in this condition had more positive perceptions of the mediation experience, were more satisfied with the outcome, and thought that the mediator’s advice was more useful. Indirect analyses showed that the outcomes mediated the effects of the conditions on perceived satisfaction. Implications of the findings are discussed in terms of responses to novelty, which include creative and divergent modes of thinking.

show abstract

“…In a study of 200 parents randomly assigned to mediation (facilitated by master's-level social workers), and to pretrial conferences (guided by judges), Ashford and Faith (2004) methods on the attitudes of parents in child-dependency disputes. The study also examines theories from the psychology of justice and trust literature for predicting the attitudes of parents regarding their dissatisfaction with the juvenile court system, the unfairness of the third parties (i.e., social work mediators or judges), and the degree of settlement achieved in the cases.…”

Section: Downloaded By [University Of Saskatchewan Library] At 18:27 mentioning

confidence: 99%

Mediation with Separated Parents: Recent Research 2002–2007

Lowenstein¹

2009

Journal of Divorce & Remarriage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Testing models of justice and trust: A study of mediation in child dependency disputes

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Comparing the Effects of Judicial Versus Child Protective Service Relationships on Parental Attitudes in the Juvenile Dependency Process

Comparing the Effects of Judicial Versus Child Protective Service Relationships on Parental Attitudes in the Juvenile Dependency Process

Who is Best at Mediating a Social Conflict? Comparing Robots, Screens and Humans

Mediation with Separated Parents: Recent Research 2002–2007

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About