2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90788-4_78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of Irregular Stone Masonry Strengthened with Cross-Laminated Timber

Abstract: The paper presents the outcomes of an experimental campaign investigating the in-plane behavior of stone masonry walls reinforced with crosslaminated timber (CLT ) panels fixed to the masonry by using steel rods and adhesives. Timber panels are intended to be positioned only on the internal side of the building walls, to preserve the integrity of the external façades and for better durability. The campaign is part of a broader project that already saw testing (from connections to full-scale walls) of clay bric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two configurations of the non-structural layers were designed for each solution, acknowledging that the intervention could be applied to either the internal or external side of the masonry walls, see Figure 1. The selected thicknesses of the timber panels were compatible with those used the in-situ campaigns performed by [10][11][12], while the timber strong-back cross-sections were selected based on the experimental campaigns reported in [20][21][22].…”
Section: Retrofit Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two configurations of the non-structural layers were designed for each solution, acknowledging that the intervention could be applied to either the internal or external side of the masonry walls, see Figure 1. The selected thicknesses of the timber panels were compatible with those used the in-situ campaigns performed by [10][11][12], while the timber strong-back cross-sections were selected based on the experimental campaigns reported in [20][21][22].…”
Section: Retrofit Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research contributions include a preliminary numerical analysis by Giongo et al [9], which involved masonry walls subjected to in-plane loading following their retrofitting with timber panels. Meanwhile, the properties of timber-to-masonry wall connections have been experimentally investigated by Riccadonna et al [10] and Rizzi et al [11], considering dry and adhesive connections, respectively. Additionally, Giongo et al [12] conducted full-scale onsite testing of masonry walls retrofitted with cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels, measuring 6 cm in thickness and fixed using the dry fasteners previously examined by Riccadonna et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be partly explained by the study of Pozza et al (2021) [36], which showed that the connection of URM and CLT panels at floor levels should be sufficient to ensure a good coupling degree. However, further study could include the adoption of adhesive connectors, which showed greater stiffness and strength than dry ones [39].…”
Section: Nested Building Intervention For Cattedra Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of timber for retrofitting was also extended to URM walls. The coupling of the latter ones with strong-backs [31][32][33][34] or massive panels (CLT) [35][36][37][38][39] proved to be capable of improving both the in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) performances of piers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various authors in the literature on this topic have examined the mechanical performance of diverse timber-based retrofit solutions. Research contributions include experimental investigations of the properties of timber-to-masonry wall connections performed by Riccadonna et al [15] and Rizzi et al [16] considering dry and adhesive connections, respectively. Additionally, Giongo et al [17] conducted full-scale onsite testing of masonry walls retrofitted with cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels, measuring 6 cm in thickness and fixed using the dry fasteners previously examined by Riccadonna et al [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%