Testing of measurement instrument software with the purpose of conformity assessment

Velychko, Oleh; Gaman, Valentyn; Gordiyenko, Tetyana; Hrabovskyi, Oleh

doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2019.154352

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In [14], the application of the process approach in project management in one of the companies dealing with information technology issues, which are also limited to software issues, was considered. [15,16] proposed special approaches to the stage of testing MI software as one of the stages of MI software LC, but they cannot be extended to the entire MI.…”

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of the process approach to the life cycle of measuring instruments

Velychko

Hrabovskyi

Gordiyenko

et al. 2021

EEJET

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The problem of increasing the reliability and competitiveness of products in all sectors of the national economy can be solved only on the basis of obtaining complete and reliable measurement information. This is facilitated by modern measuring instruments (MI), which are complex hardware and software systems. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that modern MI need an effective assessment of their quality at all stages of the life cycle (LC). This requires the development of appropriate assessment methods both at the stage of production and operation of MI. The expediency of using the process approach to MI LC stages and its advantages over the functional approach were proved. The process approach allows more effective assessment of MI quality indicators at different LC stages and is compatible with the construction of modern quality management systems. Mathematical modeling was carried out, a set process model of the MI LC was developed and its representation as a process V-model was carried out. This allows studying the interaction of processes of all MI LC stages and performing process quality management at all MI LC stages. Mathematical modeling was carried out, a set process model of evaluation of quality indicators of MI LC stages was developed and its representation as a process V-model was carried out. This allows evaluating quality indicators of the MI and its components throughout the MI LC. Recommendations for the use of international standards were formulated, in particular for project management planning, measurement processes, system requirements throughout the MI LC, risk analysis and management at the LC stages. This should help increase efficiency in achieving the planned results at all stages of the MI LC

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of the process approach to the life cycle of measuring instruments

Velychko

Hrabovskyi

Gordiyenko

et al. 2021

EEJET

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, these works do not provide any details of quality indicators. In [17], the issues of testing MI software at the national level are considered, in [18] -testing of MI software for conformity assessment. These papers detail MI software indicators to be evaluated and consider only one group of MI quality indicators related to the software part.…”

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of a system of quality assessment indicators of measuring instruments

Velychko

Hrabovskyi

Gordiyenko

et al. 2021

EEJET

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern measuring instruments (MI) are of great importance for providing measurements in all areas of the national economy. Their main purpose is to conduct accurate and reliable measurements in order to obtain complete and reliable measurement information. To perform this important function, MI must be of appropriate quality, which must be reliably assessed. In the traditional definition, MI is a technical means that is used in measurements and has standardized characteristics. For technical means, there is a traditional system of quality indicators. In addition to these quality indicators, additional specific indicators should be established for MI, which should objectively assess the metrological characteristics. The expediency of creating and using a special system of quality indicators for all stages of the MI life cycle is proved. Building such a system requires maximum use of quantitative characteristics that express certain quality indicators. Important indicators of this system are a number of MI indicators related to metrological characteristics. For MI, it is also advisable to use a common system of quality indicators for technical facilities. The proposed multiple models of MI quality indicators and evaluation of MI quality indicators allow studying the influence of MI quality indicators and performing their evaluation at all stages of the MI life cycle. Understanding and managing the system for evaluating MI quality indicators helps to increase efficiency in achieving planned results. For effective implementation of these models, it is necessary to use regulated requirements of some international and regional standards and recommendations

show abstract

“…At the national level, appropriate lists of national standards have been established, which, in particular, give the presumption of MI compliance with the essential requirements of the TR. The analysis of the state of the regulatory framework for testing MI software at the international, regional and national levels has been the subject of previous research [7][8][9][10].…”

Section: проведено порIвняльний аналIз результатIв оцIнювання вIдповimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The analysis of various aspects of MI software testing has been the subject of previous research of the authors [7][8][9][10].…”

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In [10], the main differences are identified and the necessary elements are established to achieve the presumption of software compliance with the essential TR requirements when conformity assessment of MI. However, the methods and algorithms described in [10] make it impossible to determine the validity of the results obtained from conformity assessment of MI software.…”

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation