2004
DOI: 10.21236/ada427795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of the Bio-Seeq (Smiths Detection Handheld PCR Instrument): Sensitivity, Specificity, and Effect of Interferents on Bacillus Assay Performance

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of infonnation is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of infonnation. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggesttons for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were consistent with the observations made while testing the effect of coffee creamer and cornstarch on the performance of the assay for B. anthracis spores, 6 in which 5 mg of cornstarch had no effect on assay performance. Likewise, 10 mg of coffee creamer did not significantly affect performance of the B. anthracis assay.…”
Section: 5supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were consistent with the observations made while testing the effect of coffee creamer and cornstarch on the performance of the assay for B. anthracis spores, 6 in which 5 mg of cornstarch had no effect on assay performance. Likewise, 10 mg of coffee creamer did not significantly affect performance of the B. anthracis assay.…”
Section: 5supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Likewise, 10 mg of coffee creamer did not significantly affect performance of the B. anthracis assay. As observed in the previous study, 6 an examination of the consumable suggests that the amounts of coffee creamer and cornstarch needed to partially inhibit the performance of the assay are far in excess of the amounts that would adhere to the swab tip when sampling a surface. We conclude from these results that neither coffee creamer nor cornstarch significantly inhibits the assay for F. tularensis in amounts likely to be introduced into the interior of the consumable.…”
Section: 5supporting
confidence: 57%