1998
DOI: 10.2307/2670060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Parametric versus Semiparametric Modeling in Generalized Linear Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First note that the covariances between the {m.t dj / −m.t dj /} are asymptotically negligible for different observations of t dj . Given the maximum likelihood estimator and the resulting asymptotic expansions indicated (up to first order) in corollary 1 and 2, the proof of corollary 3 can be derived from the proof in Härdle et al (1998). They considered the more general quasilikelihood so our case is even easier and we can follow line by line their proof.…”
Section: Testing the Parametric Versus The Semiparametric Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First note that the covariances between the {m.t dj / −m.t dj /} are asymptotically negligible for different observations of t dj . Given the maximum likelihood estimator and the resulting asymptotic expansions indicated (up to first order) in corollary 1 and 2, the proof of corollary 3 can be derived from the proof in Härdle et al (1998). They considered the more general quasilikelihood so our case is even easier and we can follow line by line their proof.…”
Section: Testing the Parametric Versus The Semiparametric Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…, and denote the log-likelihood estimators for this model by .γ c ,ũ,δ/. Following the arguments of Härdle et al (1998), a direct comparison ofm.T/ withc + T Tγ may be misleading, becausem.·/ has a smoothing bias which is typically non-negligible. To avoid this effect, we add a bias tõ c + T Tγ that will compensate for the bias ofm.T/, procedure B: A most traditional testing approach would be based on the likelihood ratio.…”
Section: Testing the Parametric Versus The Semiparametric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Engle et al (1986) and Heckman (1986) studied estimation using smoothing splines to estimate the nonparametric part, and Robinson (1988) and Speckman (1988) considered the same problem with kernel smoothing, while Chen (1988) studied estimation based on piecewise polynomial. Härdle et al (2000) gave a comprehensive review for PLM. When the link function in partially linear additive models (PLAMs) is the identity, we have partially additive models (Li, 2000;Liu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%