2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3700710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing pQCD and AdS/CFT energy loss at RHIC and LHC

Abstract: We compare calculations of jet quenching observables at √ s = 2.76 ATeV to preliminary LHC data from weakcoupling pQCD and strong-coupling AdS/CFT drag energy loss models. Rigorously constrained to √ s = 200 AGeV RHIC π 0 suppression data and introducing no free parameters, the pQCD-based WHDG model simultaneously describes qualitatively the suppression of light hadrons and quantitatively the azimuthal anisotropy (over many centrality classes) of light hadrons and the suppression of D mesons at LHC. The drag p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We confirm previous results pointing to the need to reduce of the jet-medium coupling from LHC to RHIC [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], with a jet-medium coupling κ LHC ≈ 0.5 κ RHIC that negates most of the increase of the jet-energy loss as expected from the factor of ∼ 2 increase of the QGP density at LHC relative to RHIC.…”
Section: Jhep08(2014)090supporting
confidence: 77%
“…We confirm previous results pointing to the need to reduce of the jet-medium coupling from LHC to RHIC [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], with a jet-medium coupling κ LHC ≈ 0.5 κ RHIC that negates most of the increase of the jet-energy loss as expected from the factor of ∼ 2 increase of the QGP density at LHC relative to RHIC.…”
Section: Jhep08(2014)090supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The interaction of heavy quarks with the medium constituents is computed considering radiative and collisional processes in the calculations indicated as Djordjevic [75], WHDG [20][21][22], CUJET3.0 [76,77], MC@sHQ+EPOS [80], BAMPS [53][54][55], and Cao, Qin, Bass [79]. Only collisional interactions are considered in the model calculations POWLANG [81,82], TAMU elastic [70] and PHSD [83].…”
Section: Comparison With Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dead-cone effect should reduce small-angle gluon radiation for quarks that have moderate energy-over-mass values, i.e. for c and b quarks with momenta up to about 10 and 30 GeV/c, respectively [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Likewise, collisional energy loss is predicted to be reduced for heavier quarks, because the spatial diffusion coefficient, which regulates the momentum transfers with the medium, scales with the inverse of the quark mass for a given quark momentum [23].…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)081mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, collisional energy loss is expected to be reduced for heavier quarks, because the spatial diffusion coefficient that regulates the momentum exchange with the medium is expected to scale as the inverse of the quark mass [25]. In the p T interval up to about 20 GeV/c, where the masses of heavy quarks are not negligible with respect to their momenta, essentially all models predict R D AA < R B AA [17][18][19][20][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], which stems directly from the mass dependence of the quark-medium interaction and is only moderately affected by the different production and fragmentation kinematics of c and b quarks (see e.g. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%