2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing preexisting antibodies prior to AAV gene transfer therapy: rationale, lessons and future considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding current data, population-based studies conducted at a global level have reported important differences in the prevalence of NAb according to the serotype evaluated, the population studied, and the NAb detection method used, the latter being a critical factor when comparing the results of the different studies [ 9 , 10 , 21 , 22 ]. This is due to the fact that AAV antibody assays are not currently standardized globally, so the cutoff points for defining positivity in each study are assay-specific [ 10 , 23 ]. Among the types of assays currently available are neutralizing antibody assays and total antibody assays, the latter being mainly ELISA-based assays with the ability to detect both neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding current data, population-based studies conducted at a global level have reported important differences in the prevalence of NAb according to the serotype evaluated, the population studied, and the NAb detection method used, the latter being a critical factor when comparing the results of the different studies [ 9 , 10 , 21 , 22 ]. This is due to the fact that AAV antibody assays are not currently standardized globally, so the cutoff points for defining positivity in each study are assay-specific [ 10 , 23 ]. Among the types of assays currently available are neutralizing antibody assays and total antibody assays, the latter being mainly ELISA-based assays with the ability to detect both neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the types of assays currently available are neutralizing antibody assays and total antibody assays, the latter being mainly ELISA-based assays with the ability to detect both neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies. Despite their convenience, reproducibility, and sensitivity, their positivity in the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies excludes a large proportion of potential candidates for gene therapy [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59,60 Clues for the distinct cardiac and off-target expression characteristics of each serotype may first come from the different abundance of common (e.g., the wild type (wt)AAV receptor KIAAA0319L) 61 and serotype-specific wtAAV receptor constellations (e.g., wtAAV9: laminin receptor and N-linked glycans; wtAAV6: N-linked sialic acid and EGF receptor; wtAAV5: N-linked sialic acid and PDGF receptor) on the various organs that convey cellular AAV binding and internalization. 62,63 As additional factors such as pre-existing neutralizing antibodies or interacting serum factors 64,65 can influence the in vivo transduction properties of AAVs, a systematic assessment across different mammalian model systems would be needed to provide a conclusive understanding of this complex mechanistic process. We nevertheless conclude up to this point that rAAV5 provides a suitable cardiac transduction pattern with negligible off-target effects when delivered to a human-sized heart by a clinically applicable ROA in combination with cardiac-biased expression control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NAb assays are either cell-based or mouse-based, and are hence expensive, time-consuming, and have a higher risk of underestimating TAb titer. Since TAb assays screen out all antibodies against AAV capsid, neutralizing and non-neutralizing, the resulting titer is more conservative and safer [ 78 ]. Moreover, different capsid serotypes have been approved by the FDA and EMA and each product requires developing a different anti-AAV antibody assay.…”
Section: Immune Responses To Adeno-associated Viruses (Aavs)mentioning
confidence: 99%