Testing Probation Outcomes in an Evidence-Based Practice Setting: Reduced Caseload Size and Intensive Supervision Effectiveness

Abstract

Probation and parole professionals argue that supervision outcomes would improve if caseloads were reduced below commonly achieved standards. Criminal justice researchers are skeptical because random assignment and strong observation studies have failed to show that criminal recidivism falls with reductions in caseload sizes. One explanation is that caseload reduction by itself is insufficient; supervision must also be allotted and distributed to make the best use of supervision resources, a cornerstone of evidence-based practice (EBP). This study uses a regression discontinuity design (RDD) to test the null hypothesis that reduced caseload in an agency using EBP has no effect on criminal recidivism. Our conclusions are that reduced caseloads in this context probably reduce criminal recidivism and probably do not increase revocations for technical violations.KEYWORDS evidence-based practice, probation caseload size, probation outcomes, regression discontinuity designWe have received helpful comments from

A Qualitative Examination of Juvenile Probation Officers as Gateway Providers to Mental Health Care

“…This is consistent with recent findings on the effectiveness of intensive supervision probation (ISP) programs with adult high-risk populations (Jalbert, Rhodes, Flygare, & Kane, 2010). Conversely, a manageable caseload could allow POs more time to identify and access resources for their clients; identified by participants as a desired outcome.…”

Enhancing Offender Re-Entry an Integrated Model for Enhancing Offender Re-Entry

“…Encouragingly, but not surprisingly, skilled probation staff are effective at improving offender outcomes (Trotter, 1996;Bonta, Rugge, Scott, Bourgon, & Yessine, 2008;Bourgon, Bonta, Rugge, & Gutierrez, 2010), demonstrating that probation supervision can be an effective external agent of change potentially contributing to reentry success. As well, and again not surprisingly, caseload size appears to effect outcome (Jalbert, Rhodes, Flygare, & Kane, 2010), suggesting that quality does count. Recently, the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) showed skills-based training for probation officers transfers to real-life client sessions and improves re-entry outcome, even when controlling for risk.…”

An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Intensive Supervision on the Recidivism of High-Risk Probationers

“…Some more recent work has challenged this contention (Jalbert et al, 2010). In this analysis, our goal is to assess the impact that ISP has on relatively short-term offending patterns and on compliance with probationary conditions.…”