2000
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2000.10608895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Relationships from the Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Using Flow as a Motivational Consequence

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to test a motivational model based on Vallerand's (1997) Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. This model incorporates situational and contextual motivational variables, and was tested using a time-lagged design. Master's level swimmers (N = 104) completed a questionnaire on two separate occasions. At Time 1, situational social factors (perceptions of success and perceptions of the motivational climate), situational motivational mediators (perceptions of autono… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
87
2
18

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
87
2
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the BREQ is a contextual measure of exercise motivation, it seems reasonable to suggest that the scale would be strongly related only with other contextual measures such as psychological need satisfaction in exercise contexts and exercise behavior. Indeed, our results from Phase 1 of this study along with previous research in the sport domain (Kowal & Fortier, 2000) support such a proposition. However, optimism as measured by the LOT is a dispositional variable that is conceptually analogous to personality dimensions, which, according to the Vallerand model, reside at the global level and should be less strongly related to constructs measured at any other level.…”
Section: Relations With Motivational Constructssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Given that the BREQ is a contextual measure of exercise motivation, it seems reasonable to suggest that the scale would be strongly related only with other contextual measures such as psychological need satisfaction in exercise contexts and exercise behavior. Indeed, our results from Phase 1 of this study along with previous research in the sport domain (Kowal & Fortier, 2000) support such a proposition. However, optimism as measured by the LOT is a dispositional variable that is conceptually analogous to personality dimensions, which, according to the Vallerand model, reside at the global level and should be less strongly related to constructs measured at any other level.…”
Section: Relations With Motivational Constructssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…El valor de alfa obtenido en este estudio fue de .84 para desmotivación y para regulación externa, .80 para regulación introyectada y para regulación identificada, .84 para motivación intrínseca al conocimiento, .81 para motivación intrínseca al logro y .74 para motivación intrínseca a las experiencias estimulantes. Para evaluar la motivación autodeterminada se utilizó el índice de autodeterminación (IAD) que se ha mostrado como válido y fiable en diferentes trabajos (Chantal, Robin, Vernat, y Bernache--Asollant, 2005;Kowal y Fortier, 2000) y se calcula con la siguiente fórmula: (2 x (MI conocimiento + MI ejecución + MI estimulación)/3) + ((ME identificada + ME integrada/2)) --((ME externa + ME introyectada)/2) --(2 x Desmotivación) (Vallerand, 1997). Se obtuvo un alfa de Cronbach de .87.…”
Section: Medidasunclassified
“…El valor de alfa obtenido en este estudio fue de .84 para desmotivación y para regulación externa, .80 para regulación introyectada y para regulación identificada, .84 para motivación intrínseca al conocimiento, .81 para motivación intrínseca al logro y .74 para motivación intrínseca a las experiencias estimulantes. Para evaluar la motivación autodeterminada se utilizó el índice de autodeterminación (IAD) que se ha mostrado como válido y fiable en diferentes trabajos (Chantal, Robin, Vernat, y Bernache-Asollant, 2005); (Kowal y Fortier, 2000) y se calcula con la siguiente fórmula: (2 x (MI conocimiento + MI ejecución + MI estimulación)/3) + ((ME identificada + ME integrada/2)) -((ME externa + ME introyectada)/2) -(2 x Desmotivación) (Vallerand, 1997).…”
Section: Mediadores Psicológicos Se Utilizó La Escala De Satisfaccióunclassified