2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing reproducibility of vitrinite and solid bitumen reflectance measurements in North American unconventional source-rock reservoir petroleum systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we see no evidence for the interconnectedness of organic pores in solid bitumen and note that some of the SEM-visualized pores may be artifacts of sample preparation . The low abundance of SEM-visualized porosity in the immature to early condensate samples of this study is generally consistent with prior works which have evaluated porosity in Bakken shale samples via SEM. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we see no evidence for the interconnectedness of organic pores in solid bitumen and note that some of the SEM-visualized pores may be artifacts of sample preparation . The low abundance of SEM-visualized porosity in the immature to early condensate samples of this study is generally consistent with prior works which have evaluated porosity in Bakken shale samples via SEM. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This conversion is typically performed because VR o measurement has a much longer historical usage in petroleum systems research and is globally regarded as the standard thermal proxy technique in sedimentary basins. For example, VR o is used for the placement of prospective boundary limits on hydrocarbon-related thermal maturity windows, e.g., immature, oil, and wet and dry gas. Moreover, there are issues with the usage of BR o due to the sometimes heterogeneous textures and presentations of solid bitumen, the possibility of its migration, the confusion of its identification with that of other sedimentary organic matter types, including vitrinite, and the sometimes absence of its strong relationship to other thermal proxies in the same sample or sample set. Nevertheless, the observation that most of the currently produced source-rock reservoirs globally occur in distal marine strata, where vitrinite is scarce, or are Lower to Middle Paleozoic in age from before the evolution and radiation of vascular land plants means that VR o measurement is not a universally useful thermal proxy and that other proxies, such as BR o are necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature suggests different approaches to select the bitumen population representing indigenous bitumen and, therefore, should be used to correlate with vitrinite. Jacob [59] recommended the selection of the bitumen with the lowest reflectance values, whereas others (e.g., [61,67]) preferred the bitumen population with the highest reflectance. Solid bitumens with a flat surface and without visible nanoporosity are better for reflectance measurements, according to Sanei et al [68].…”
Section: Relationship Between Solid Bitumen and Huminite/vitrinite Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the thermal maturity of organic matter is vital to reconstructing the thermal history and evolution of hydrocarbon generation of source rocks in petroliferous basins (Hou et al, 2017). Vitrinite reflectance (R o ) is a useful and reliable parameter for determining the thermal maturity of organic matter (Hackley et al, 2020). However, vitrinite is a diagenetic product of post‐Silurian higher plant debris (Ferreiro Mählmann & Le Bayon, 2016), and is absent in the Precambrian strata, thus, maturity levels of organic matter in the Precambrian strata cannot be assessed by this method (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%