2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing species abundance distribution models in tropical forest successions: Implications for fine-scale passive restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Rarefaction was estimated as the mean of 100 replicate bootstrapping runs to estimate 95% confidence intervals (e.g. Campos et al 2018;Rodrigues et al 2019;2019b). Whenever the 95% confidence intervals did not overlap, species numbers differed significantly at P < 0.05 (Colwell et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Rarefaction was estimated as the mean of 100 replicate bootstrapping runs to estimate 95% confidence intervals (e.g. Campos et al 2018;Rodrigues et al 2019;2019b). Whenever the 95% confidence intervals did not overlap, species numbers differed significantly at P < 0.05 (Colwell et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Rodrigues et al, (2019), we evaluated the number of stem-dominant and carbondominant species in the study area. In this sense, we considered as 'carbon dominants' the species that accumulated 50% of the total carbon when ranked by decreasing order of contribution to the total AGC and as 'stem dominants' the species that accumulated 50% of the total number of individuals in the tree community (Bastin et al 2015;Fauset et al 2015;Rodrigues et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations