2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing stellar evolution models with detached eclipsing binaries

Abstract: Stellar evolution codes, as all other numerical tools, need to be verified. One of the standard stellar objects that allow stringent tests of stellar evolution theory and models, are detached eclipsing binaries. We have used 19 such objects to test our stellar evolution code, in order to see whether standard methods and assumptions suffice to reproduce the observed global properties. In this paper we concentrate on three effects that contain a specific uncertainty: atomic diffusion as used for standard solar m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(135 reference statements)
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise modelling of detached double-lined eclipsing binaries also requires CBM in order to match the observed stellar parameters at concurrent ages Deheuvels et al 2016;Higl & Weiss 2017;Claret & Torres 2018;Constantino & Baraffe 2018;Claret & Torres 2019). Given their ability to break some of the degeneracies in the modelling, these systems offer perhaps our best constraints of main-sequence core overshoot.…”
Section: Modification Of the Composition Profile Through Cbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise modelling of detached double-lined eclipsing binaries also requires CBM in order to match the observed stellar parameters at concurrent ages Deheuvels et al 2016;Higl & Weiss 2017;Claret & Torres 2018;Constantino & Baraffe 2018;Claret & Torres 2019). Given their ability to break some of the degeneracies in the modelling, these systems offer perhaps our best constraints of main-sequence core overshoot.…”
Section: Modification Of the Composition Profile Through Cbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable evidence for additional mixing for Core Hydrogen Burning stars (CHB) on the upper main sequence, with a consensus that it extends to roughly 20% of the local pressure scale height (Schaller et al 1992;Herwig et al 1997;Weiss & Ferguson 2009;Miller Bertolami 2016;Ekström et al 2012). This is seen by the ability to reproduce the observations of the main sequence stars in open clusters (Maeder & Meynet 1991;Stothers & Chin 1992;Schroder et al 1997) and eclipsing binaries (Claret 2007;Stancliffe et al 2015;Higl & Weiss 2017).…”
Section: Core Hydrogen Burningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stars with M > 0.8 M generally agree with theoretical models to within observational uncertainties. Lower mass stars, however, are often observed to have radii that are 5-15% larger than model predictions (López-Morales 2007; Morales et al 2008;Torres et al 2010;Kraus et al 2011;Higl & Weiss 2017;Cruz et al 2018;Kesseli et al 2018). There is observational and theoretical evidence to suggest that magnetic fields could be the cause (Chabrier et al 2007;Morales et al 2010;Feiden & Chaboyer 2013;MacDonald & Mullan 2017), due to interaction with the partially convective outer atmospheres and/or generation of cool starspots at polar latitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%