Testing strategies to enhance transplant success under stressful conditions at a tidal marsh restoration project

Abstract

Tidal marsh restoration is becoming an increasingly common tool to plan for future sea level rise. Subsided marshes' elevation can be restored through sediment additions, which may necessitate the reestablishment of vegetation. Understanding key actions to increase vegetation cover at areas that remain persistently bare following elevation restoration is a critical component of a project's long‐term success. Dominant species can shape ecosystem function, as well as ameliorate stressful environments. We transplanted the dominant species, Salicornia pacifica, into bare areas of a restored tidal marsh in central California, United States, 3 years following a sediment addition. We tested salt hardening of plants before transplanting, targeted irrigation, transplant size, and planting configuration to identify management actions that could help vegetation persist in the most stressful areas of the high marsh. Weekly targeted irrigation until the first rains began was critical for small plant survivorship. We found that larger plants had increased survivorship and contributed higher amounts of growth and cover but did not facilitate the performance of nearby smaller plants. After 2 years, we determined that using lone, larger plants was more cost‐effective than multiple smaller plants at our tidal marsh. However, performance was highly site‐specific with dramatically less growth at a drier site with sandier soil. Our results highlight the importance of identifying site‐specific restoration strategies that either ameliorate or help plants tolerate stressful conditions, contributing to the continued success of tidal marsh restoration for climate resilience.