2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the accretion-induced field-decay and spin-up model for recycled pulsars

Abstract: Millisecond radio pulsars have long been proposed to form from a spin-up recycling process in a binary system. In this paper, we demonstrate that the accretion-induced field-decay and spin-up model for recycled pulsars can indeed produce these millisecond pulsars with relatively weak magnetic fields of 10 8 −10 9 G and short spin periods of a few milliseconds. Our results also suggest that the value of the currently observed highest spin frequency of millisecond pulsars may simply depend on the amount of mass … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Old NSs in low mass X-ray binaries have magnetic fields ∼ 10 9 G which is three orders of magnitude smaller than fields inferred for young NSs in high mass X-ray binaries and young isolated radio pulsars. The magnetic moments of NSs in binary systems is inversely correlated with accretion history (Taam & Three distinct mechanisms have been suggested for the reduction of the magnetic field: (i) accretion induced heating decreases the conductivity of the star thus leading to the accelerated ohmic decay (Konar & Bhattacharya 1997;Geppert & Urpin 1994;Urpin & Konenkov 1997); (ii) vortex-fluxoid interactions in the superconducting core (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985;Srinivasan et al 1990); and (iii) magnetic screening or burial (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Komberg 1974;Cheng & Zhang 1998;Konar & Bhattacharya 1997;Payne & Melatos 2004;Wang et al 2012). A well known problem with the field burial scenario is that the buried magnetic field will be prone to instabilities that rapidly will overturn the field (Litwin et al 2001;Vigelius & Melatos 2008;Mukherjee & Bhattacharya 2012).…”
Section: A Relation Between Space Velocity and Field Growth Timescalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Old NSs in low mass X-ray binaries have magnetic fields ∼ 10 9 G which is three orders of magnitude smaller than fields inferred for young NSs in high mass X-ray binaries and young isolated radio pulsars. The magnetic moments of NSs in binary systems is inversely correlated with accretion history (Taam & Three distinct mechanisms have been suggested for the reduction of the magnetic field: (i) accretion induced heating decreases the conductivity of the star thus leading to the accelerated ohmic decay (Konar & Bhattacharya 1997;Geppert & Urpin 1994;Urpin & Konenkov 1997); (ii) vortex-fluxoid interactions in the superconducting core (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985;Srinivasan et al 1990); and (iii) magnetic screening or burial (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Komberg 1974;Cheng & Zhang 1998;Konar & Bhattacharya 1997;Payne & Melatos 2004;Wang et al 2012). A well known problem with the field burial scenario is that the buried magnetic field will be prone to instabilities that rapidly will overturn the field (Litwin et al 2001;Vigelius & Melatos 2008;Mukherjee & Bhattacharya 2012).…”
Section: A Relation Between Space Velocity and Field Growth Timescalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several theoretical mechanisms exist to explain the trend, such as accelerated Ohmic decay (Urpin & Geppert 1995), interactions between superfluid vortices and superconductor flux tubes within the stellar interior (Srinivasan et al 1990), or the process of magnetic burial (Blondin & Freese 1986;Shibazaki et al 1989). In magnetic burial, the focus of this paper, matter is guided onto the polar cap by the magnetic field to form a mountain-like density profile supported by the compressed equatorial magnetic field ('magnetic mountain') Melatos & Phinney 2001;Payne & Melatos 2004;Mukherjee & Bhattacharya 2012;Wang et al 2012). The resulting mass quadrupole moment emits gravitational E-mail:suvorovarthur@gmail.com radiation (Ushomirsky et al 2000;Melatos & Payne 2005;Vigelius & Melatos 2009c;Priymak et al 2011;Lasky 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The minimum spin period and bottom field are independent of the initial values of magnetic field and spin period; see Figure 3 [72]. The bottom fields mildly vary with the accretion rates and the accreted mass (Figure 4), while the minimum period is insensitive to them ( Figure 5) [72,73].…”
Section: Accretion-induced Field Decay and Spin-upmentioning
confidence: 95%