2014
DOI: 10.4236/tel.2014.48085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the CAPM Theory Based on a New Model for Fama-French 25 Portfolio Returns

Abstract: In this paper, a new model is proposed to empirically test the Capital Asset Pricing Theory. This model is based on the EGARCH-type volatilities in Nelson (1991) and the non-Normal errors of SSAEPD in Zhu and Zinde-Walsh (2009). Is the CAPM theory in Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Mossin (1966) still alive? Returns of Fama-French 25 stock portfolios (1926-2011) are analyzed. The Maximum Likelihood Estimation Method is used. Likelihood Ratio test (LR) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS) are used to do model dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of hypotheses testing revealed the single-factor capital asset pricing model is invalid in the Jordanian stock market. This conclusion is in line with the results of studies of many researchers who reached the same conclusion about this market (Alqisie & Alqurran, 2016;Alrgaibat, 2015;Blitz et al, 2013) and about many other countries (Dajčman et al, 2013;Dzaja, & Aljinovic, 2013;Li, Gan, Zhuo, & Mizrach, 2014;Nyangara et al, 2016;Obrimah et al, 2015;Saji, 2014;Wu et al, 2017). The hypothesized relationship between the expected rate of return and variables of size, financial leverage, and market rate of return was found to be insignificant ; the expected rate of return for a stock is directly related to the operating leverage of the stock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results of hypotheses testing revealed the single-factor capital asset pricing model is invalid in the Jordanian stock market. This conclusion is in line with the results of studies of many researchers who reached the same conclusion about this market (Alqisie & Alqurran, 2016;Alrgaibat, 2015;Blitz et al, 2013) and about many other countries (Dajčman et al, 2013;Dzaja, & Aljinovic, 2013;Li, Gan, Zhuo, & Mizrach, 2014;Nyangara et al, 2016;Obrimah et al, 2015;Saji, 2014;Wu et al, 2017). The hypothesized relationship between the expected rate of return and variables of size, financial leverage, and market rate of return was found to be insignificant ; the expected rate of return for a stock is directly related to the operating leverage of the stock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These two papers are part of a wide range of research on the empirical relevance of the CAPM theory, considering non-standard stochastic assumptions that explicitly allow for heavy tails and/or asymmetry in the underlying distributions. Other works by Affleck-Graves [27] , MacKinlay and Richardson [28] , Zhou [29] , Harvey and Siddique [30] , Li [31] , Theodosiou and Theodossiou [32] , and more recently, Bao et al [33] , are examples of extensive research on the application of flexible non-Gaussian families of distributions in the problem of risk assessment using the CAPM.…”
Section: Kaplan and Petersonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [31] , Bao et al [33] , and others modelled the distribution of the error term in Equation (8) using asymmetric power distributions or asymmetric exponential power distributions. Theodossiou and Theodossiou [32] analyzed the sensitivity of β parameter estimates in light of outliers in the series of stock market returns, revealing substantial bias in OLS estimates in the case of non-normal empirical distributions of financial returns. While Theodossiou and Theodossiou's [32] feasible estimation procedure does not explicitly define the distribution of the error term in CAPM regressions, it is equivalent to the OLS procedure (under the Gaussian model) and importantly, yields significantly different β estimates in the case of heavy-tailed and asymmetric data.…”
Section: Empirical Insights Into Capm Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation