Testing the credibility, feasibility and acceptability of an optimised behavioural intervention (OBI) for avoidant chronic low back pain patients: protocol for a randomised feasibility study

Abstract

BackgroundChronic back pain continues to be a costly and prevalent condition. The latest NICE guidelines issued in 2009 state that for patients with persistent back pain (of between six weeks and twelve months duration), who are highly distressed and/or disabled and for whom exercise, manual therapy and acupuncture has not been beneficial, the evidence supports a combination of around 100 hours of combined physical and psychological treatment. This is costly, and may prove unacceptable to many patients. A key recommendation of these guidelines was for further randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological treatment and to target treatment to specific sub-groups of patients. Recent trials that have included psychological interventions have shown only moderate improvement at best, and results are not maintained long term. There is therefore a need to test theoretically driven interventions that focus on specific high-risk sub-groups, in which the intervention is delivered at full integrity against a credible control.Methods/designA feasibility study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing psychologist-delivered Contextual Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CCBT) against Treatment As Usual (TAU) physiotherapy delivered by physiotherapists for the treatment of chronic lower back pain in ‘avoidant’ patients. Ninety-two patients referred for physiotherapy will be recruited and randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive CCBT or TAU. Treatment groups will be balanced by centre and pain interference score. Primary outcomes include assessing the credibility and acceptability of the intervention, and to demonstrate proof of principle through a greater change in pain acceptance in the CCBT arm, measured by the Acceptance and Action –II and the Chronic Pain Acceptance questionnaires. In addition, the feasibility of carrying out a full trial will be explored with reference to recruitment and follow-up rates including the assessment of the burden of outcome measure completion. Secondary patient outcomes include disability, pain, fear of movement, mood, quality of life, and global recovery. Outcomes are measured at three and six months post-randomisation.DiscussionThis paper details the rationale, design, therapist training system and recruitment methods to be used in a feasibility study which will inform the design and efficient implementation of a future definitive RCT.Trial registrationISRCTN43733490

Psychological Distress in Healthy Low-Risk First-Time Mothers during the Postpartum Period: An Exploratory Study

“…The results of this exploratory study support a set of feasible and acceptable data collection procedures and outcome measures suitable [ 89 ] for studying psychological distress in first-time new mothers during the postpartum period. The knowledge gained from this study is critical in terms of achieving methodological rigor and efficient implementation [ 90 ] for a future RCT using the Alpha-Stim AID.…”

Delivering an Optimised Behavioural Intervention (OBI) to people with low back pain with high psychological risk; results and lessons learnt from a feasibility randomised controlled trial of Contextual Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CCBT) vs. Physiotherapy

“…Treatment approaches based on this model include Acceptance and Commitment Therapy [19] and can be more generically referred to as Contextual Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CCBT) [9, 20, 21]. …”

An evaluation of osteopathic treatment on psychological outcomes with patients suffering from chronic pain: A prospective observational cohort study collected through a health and well-being academy

“…It was suggested there that further optimising of the psychological effects of osteopathy through integrating cognitive behavioural principles could be made, whereby greater integration is made in standard osteopathic care. In addition to this, Pincus and McCracken ( Pincus et al, 2013 ) agreed with this in principle, but highlight that in most cases these interventions have only shown moderate improvements at best and without long-term improvements. They, therefore, suggested that any additional psychological interventions applied with OMT should be targeted at certain clinical subgroups (high risk) and should be theoretically driven.…”