2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2019.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the degree of overlap for the expected value of random intervals

Abstract: Some hypothesis tests for analyzing the degree of overlap between the expected value of random intervals are provided. For this purpose, a suitable measure to quantify the overlapping grade between intervals is considered on the basis of the Szymkiewicz-Simpson coefficient defined for general sets. It can be seen as a kind of likeness index to measure the mutual information between two intervals. On one hand, an estimator for the proposed degree of overlap between intervals is provided and its strong consisten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…erefore, when the network has 1/2 of the same nodes, the node overlap is about 33%. In the experiment, according to the account association information provided by some users, we extract 20% of the node pairs from the internetwork node pairs to construct the experimental training set [18]. To evaluate the model reasonably, the NS algorithm and the Grh algorithm, which are currently better in mining associated users, are selected for comparison, the NS algorithm and the Grh algorithm select the node with a larger degree value as the seed node, that is, 10% * N nodes are selected from the top25% node degree values of the network as seed nodes, where N is the total number of network nodes.…”
Section: Results' Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, when the network has 1/2 of the same nodes, the node overlap is about 33%. In the experiment, according to the account association information provided by some users, we extract 20% of the node pairs from the internetwork node pairs to construct the experimental training set [18]. To evaluate the model reasonably, the NS algorithm and the Grh algorithm, which are currently better in mining associated users, are selected for comparison, the NS algorithm and the Grh algorithm select the node with a larger degree value as the seed node, that is, 10% * N nodes are selected from the top25% node degree values of the network as seed nodes, where N is the total number of network nodes.…”
Section: Results' Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Morisita-Horn index was found to be appropriate for measuring the pairwise overlapping distance between phenological curves ( Luna-Nieves et al., 2022 ). There are two other widely accepted measures (or metrics) of overlap between curves: the Jaccard overlap index ( Smith, Solow & Preston, 1996 ; Yue & Clayton, 2005 ) and the Szymkiewicz-Simpson overlap coefficient ( Ramos-Guajardo, González-Rodríguez & Colubi, 2020 ); however, these indices do not represent the intensity and the proportion of overlap of phenological curves. The Jaccard overlapping area index only accounts for the overlapping area of both samples but ignores the area outside of the overlapping area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling was carried out following measurement rules that prevent α and β errors. (Chi, Glueck, & Muller, 2019;Ramos-Guajardo, González-Rodríguez, & Colubi, 2020). The error limit value is measured using the help of G*Power analysis.…”
Section: Participantmentioning
confidence: 99%