2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the differential effects of changes in psychological contract breach and fulfillment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
145
3
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
145
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous studies were not reached consistent about the composition of HPWS (Posthuma, Campion, Masimova, & Campion, 2013), the dimensions of HPWS typically include selective recruitment, extensive training, developmental performance appraisal, information sharing, incentive reward, flexible job design, teamwork and participation in decision-making. These management practices refer to some obligations that employers have toward employees, which are important part of the employees' psychological contract (Cassar & Briner, 2011;Conway et al, 2011). Furthermore, employees' interpretations of HRM practices are associated with the status of psychological contract and employee outcomes (Guzzo & Noonan, 1994).…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Perceived Hpwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although previous studies were not reached consistent about the composition of HPWS (Posthuma, Campion, Masimova, & Campion, 2013), the dimensions of HPWS typically include selective recruitment, extensive training, developmental performance appraisal, information sharing, incentive reward, flexible job design, teamwork and participation in decision-making. These management practices refer to some obligations that employers have toward employees, which are important part of the employees' psychological contract (Cassar & Briner, 2011;Conway et al, 2011). Furthermore, employees' interpretations of HRM practices are associated with the status of psychological contract and employee outcomes (Guzzo & Noonan, 1994).…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Perceived Hpwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the perceptual and idiosyncratic nature of the psychological contract, combined with the ever-changing business environment has made psychological contract breach (PCB) become frequent, even inevitable phenomena in current organizations (Kiewitz, Restubog, Zagenczyk, & Hochwarter, 2009;Low & Bordia, 2011). Although the negative consequences of PCB have been well understood (Conway, Guest, & Trenberth, 2011;Robinson & Morrison, 2000), there are very few studies have focus on the impact of PCB on work engagement, and the mechanism behind this effect is not yet sufficiently explored. To the best of our knowledge, we only find Rayton and Yalabik (2014) considered this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, research on the relationship between breach and outcomes has long been on going, but few studies have investigated the relationship between breach and wellbeing as an outcome (e.g. Guest, 1987;Guest, Isaksson and de Witte, 2010;Conway, Guest and Trenberth, 2011). According to Guest (1987), HRM focuses on the individual needs, amongst which employee well-being is crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When employees perceive that their organizations have failed to fulfil one or more obligations, they experience psychological contract breach (Morrison & Robinson, 1997). Extensive studies have explored the consequences of psychological contract breach, including different aspects of negative work attitudes and behaviours (e.g., Conway, Guest, & Trenberth, 2011;Ng, Feldman, & Lam, 2010). Nonetheless, the research on antecedents to psychological contract breach has shown the complexity of the forces that shape this subjective reality.…”
Section: Practitioner Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%