2022
DOI: 10.1086/720612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Dismal Theorem

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ackerman and Stanton (2012), Bosetti et al (2007), Gunasekera et al (2008), Manne and Richels (2005), Tol (2013), Weitzman (2012) do not present new estimates of the total impact of climate change. Anthoff and Tol (2022) count over 200 papers that estimate the social cost of carbon, each of which has at least one estimate of the total impact of climate change-but very few of these papers present new estimates of the total impact. It is not clear why Howard and Sterner (2017) included 6 of these papers but not the other 140 or so that were published before 2017.…”
Section: Declaration Of Competing Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ackerman and Stanton (2012), Bosetti et al (2007), Gunasekera et al (2008), Manne and Richels (2005), Tol (2013), Weitzman (2012) do not present new estimates of the total impact of climate change. Anthoff and Tol (2022) count over 200 papers that estimate the social cost of carbon, each of which has at least one estimate of the total impact of climate change-but very few of these papers present new estimates of the total impact. It is not clear why Howard and Sterner (2017) included 6 of these papers but not the other 140 or so that were published before 2017.…”
Section: Declaration Of Competing Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of estimates beyond 3.2 • C of warming has increased tenfold. As there is a non-negligible chance of large warming, the previous paucity of evidence allowed for speculation about the expected impact of climate change (Weitzman, 2009;Anthoff and Tol, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ackerman and Stanton (2012), Bosetti et al (2007), Gunasekera et al (2008), Manne and Richels (2005), Tol (2013), Weitzman (2012) do not present new estimates of the total impact of climate change. Anthoff and Tol (2022) count over 200 papers that estimate the social cost of carbon, each of which has at least one estimate of the total impact of climate change-but very few of these papers present new estimates of the total impact. It is not clear why Howard and Sterner (2017) included 6 of these papers but not the other 140 or so that were published before 2017.…”
Section: Declaration Of Competing Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ackerman and Stanton (2012), Bosetti et al (2007), Gunasekera et al (2008), Manne and Richels (2005), Tol (2013), Weitzman (2012) do not present new estimates of the total impact of climate change, focus instead on the social cost of carbon. Anthoff and Tol (2022) count over 200 papers that estimate the social cost of carbon, each of which has at least one estimate of the total impact of climate change-but very few of these papers present new estimates of the total impact. It is not clear why Howard and Sterner (2017) included 6 of these papers but not the other 194 or so.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%