2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2001.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the dissociative taxon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
14
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
14
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our findings confirm the clinical utility of identifying traumatized patients with severe levels of dissociation, and tailoring treatment to this patient group Lanius et al, 2010;Resick et al, 2012). Although the use of DES-T for identification of patients with severe dissociative disorders has been questioned (e.g., Modestin & Erni, 2004), our data support the utility of the DES-T for a preliminary identification of patients with severe dissociative problems in a polysymptomatic complex trauma inpatient population. Being a clinician-friendly instrument, this could facilitate the identification of patients with severe dissociative problems when a full diagnostic assessment for dissociative disorders is not feasible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Overall, our findings confirm the clinical utility of identifying traumatized patients with severe levels of dissociation, and tailoring treatment to this patient group Lanius et al, 2010;Resick et al, 2012). Although the use of DES-T for identification of patients with severe dissociative disorders has been questioned (e.g., Modestin & Erni, 2004), our data support the utility of the DES-T for a preliminary identification of patients with severe dissociative problems in a polysymptomatic complex trauma inpatient population. Being a clinician-friendly instrument, this could facilitate the identification of patients with severe dissociative problems when a full diagnostic assessment for dissociative disorders is not feasible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Overall, our findings confirm the clinical utility of identifying traumatized patients with PTSD and severe levels of dissociation, and tailoring treatment to this patient group (Cloitre et al, 2012; Lanius et al, 2010; Resick et al, 2012). Although the use of the DES-T for identification of patients with severe dissociative disorders has been questioned (e.g., Modestin & Erni, 2004), our data support the utility of the DES-T for a preliminary identification of patients with severe dissociative problems in a complex trauma inpatient population. Being a clinician-friendly instrument, this could facilitate the identification of patients with severe dissociative problems when a full diagnostic assessment for dissociative disorders is not feasible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In a meta-analytic study, Van Ijzendoorn and Schuengel (1996) provide evidence for the sound psychometric properties of the DES. We chose not to calculate the Dissociative Experiences Scale Taxon (DES-T; Waller et al, 1996), as recent research casts doubts on its stability in non-clinical samples (Watson, 2003a) and its accuracy in identifying pathological dissociation (Modestin and Erni, 2004).…”
Section: Psychometric Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%