2008
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2008.9753871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Equal Energy Hypothesis in Noise-Exposed Fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, increasing the number of pulse pressures and SEL cum increased the likelihood of soft tissue damage. Although this may seem intuitive, the equal-energy hypothesis suggests that the effects of a large single pulse of energy are equivalent to the effects of energy received from many smaller pulses (Smith and Gilley 2008). Although our study was not designed to evaluate that hypothesis, previous studies on the effects of pulse pressure associated with pile driving do not support the hypothesis for tissue damage (i.e., fewer louder strikes were more effective than many quieter strikes; Halvorsen et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this study, increasing the number of pulse pressures and SEL cum increased the likelihood of soft tissue damage. Although this may seem intuitive, the equal-energy hypothesis suggests that the effects of a large single pulse of energy are equivalent to the effects of energy received from many smaller pulses (Smith and Gilley 2008). Although our study was not designed to evaluate that hypothesis, previous studies on the effects of pulse pressure associated with pile driving do not support the hypothesis for tissue damage (i.e., fewer louder strikes were more effective than many quieter strikes; Halvorsen et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%