2016
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v32i2.9598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing The FDI Hypothesis Of Location Advantage In The Case Of Kuwait

Abstract: This study examines the determining factors of FDI inflows in Kuwait. Data sample covers the period from 1975 to 2013. In this study, estimates are tested using Augmented Dickey and Fuller, Johansen Co-integration tests and Error Correction Model (ECM). Results of the Johansen test show that all variables are co-integrated with the Kuwait’s FDI inflows in the long run. Interestingly, factors of market size, economic development, financial deepening, number of population, infrastructure development, openness, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Akhtar, Khan, and Hussain (2013) conclude that resource-seeking FDI in Saudi Arabia is determined by trade openness. In the same context, Al-Shammari, Al-Halaq, and Al-Shammari (2016) find that openness is cointegrated with the FDI inflows in Kuwait. Aziz and Mishra (2016), who investigated the determinants of FDI inflows in 16 Arab countries (including the GCC countries) from the period 1984 to 2012, confirm these results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Akhtar, Khan, and Hussain (2013) conclude that resource-seeking FDI in Saudi Arabia is determined by trade openness. In the same context, Al-Shammari, Al-Halaq, and Al-Shammari (2016) find that openness is cointegrated with the FDI inflows in Kuwait. Aziz and Mishra (2016), who investigated the determinants of FDI inflows in 16 Arab countries (including the GCC countries) from the period 1984 to 2012, confirm these results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Akhtar, Khan, and Hussain (2013) conclude that resource-seeking FDI in Saudi Arabia is determined by trade openness, fiscal health and the presence of greater oil reserves. Al-Shammari et al (2016) find that market size, economic development, financial deepening, population increases, infrastructure development, openness and oil rent are cointegrated with the FDI inflows in Kuwait. These results are confirmed by Aziz and Mishra (2016), who investigated the determinants of FDI inflows in 16 Arab countries (including the GCC countries) in the 1984–2012 period.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They contrast and demonstrate the inverted impact of FDI inflows (as % of GDP) on domestic investments by businesses and other investors. The case of "Shocking FDI -2" left-hand graph in the middle of the combined graphs illustrates the impact on investment of negative shocks, or decline in FDI, as also expected by Al-Shammari, N and Halaq, S. (2016). Conversely, the FDI shock in the middle graph which is positioned in the center of the page, titled "Increasing FDI inflows to GDP by + 2" assumes declines in FDI by 2 percentage log scale -value points.…”
Section: Dynamic Scenario Simulations Findingsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The majority of reviewed articles using the OLI paradigm as a theoretical framework examine the impact of both macroeconomic and institutional country-specific factors (e.g. market size, openness, institutional and infrastructure quality) on FDI inflows to MENA countries (Al-Shammari et al, 2016;Aziz and Mishra, 2016;Erdal and Tatoglu, 2002;Mina, 2007;Mohamed and Sidiropoulos, 2010;Okafor et al, 2017;Roberts and Almahmood, 2009;Rogmans and Ebbers, 2013).…”
Section: Oli Paradigm and Internalization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally considered that "good infrastructure increases the productivity of investments and therefore stimulates FDI flows" (Asiedu, 2002, p. 111). In the context of the MENA region, the majority of the studies (Al-Shammari et al, 2016;Bouabdi, 2015;Burger et al, 2016;Erdal and Tatoglu, 2002;Mina, 2007;Okafor et al, 2017;Rogmans, 2013;Sekkat and Véganzones-Varoudakis, 2007;Siddiqui and Iqbal, 2018) find a significant and positive relationship between infrastructure and FDI, while only a few studies (Kobeissi, 2005;Mohamed and Sidiropoulos, 2010;Onyeiwu, 2003;Salem and Baum, 2016) report no impact.…”
Section: Infrastructure Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%