2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the hypothesis hydrogen jets may significantly contribute to global warming through jets contrails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A. Boretti stresses that, although hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe; however, it is freely available on Earth only in negligible amounts, but splitting the water molecule to produce hydrogen requires huge energy input [97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Boretti stresses that, although hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe; however, it is freely available on Earth only in negligible amounts, but splitting the water molecule to produce hydrogen requires huge energy input [97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hydrogen combustion does not produce aerosol particles which serve as nuclei for the ice crystals to form [13]. Recent studies from Burkhardt et al [18], Grewe et al [24], Boretti [43] suggest a lower contribution to global warming from hydrogen contrails due to the reduced number of soot. Some studies suggest that aerosol particles present in the air might also serve as nuclei [33].…”
Section: Hydrogen Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ammonia (NH 3 )-based aircraft , could be an alternative to hydrogen (H 2 )-based aircraft, which are being proposed in a zero-emission target. The advantages of NH 3 stem from two features: the larger amount of energy per unit volume and the safety of NH 3 compared to H 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H 2 is being proposed as a fuel to be used in aircraft with turbojets, turbofans, turboprops, and propellers driven by piston engines, as well as in innovative electric propellers driven by batteries and FCs. H 2 is also the preferred fuel for hypersonic propulsion, either rocket-based combined cycle (RBCC) or turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) engines, combining rockets or turbojets with ramjets and scramjets, which, however, will be unlikely to be ready for use in commercial airline products within the next decade. Here we consider the possible use of NH 3 instead of H 2 or conventional hydrocarbon (HC) fuels in jet engines, propeller piston engines, and electric propellers driven by batteries and FCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%