2012
DOI: 10.1093/oep/gps029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the impact of inflation targeting and central bank independence on labour market outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They conclude that IT countries perform consistently better than the control group in terms of controlling inflation and, most importantly, without inducing additional volatility in output. Larsson and Zetterberg (2013) provide evidence of a positive impact of IT on real wages and no adverse effects on employment using a panel of 20 OECD countries from 1982-2003. Ardakani e al.…”
Section: Monetary Policy Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that IT countries perform consistently better than the control group in terms of controlling inflation and, most importantly, without inducing additional volatility in output. Larsson and Zetterberg (2013) provide evidence of a positive impact of IT on real wages and no adverse effects on employment using a panel of 20 OECD countries from 1982-2003. Ardakani e al.…”
Section: Monetary Policy Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to mention that there were a number of studies which specifically aimed to assess the effectiveness of IT policy on alternative key macroeconomic variables. The impact of inflation targeting on the level of inflation expectations is illustrated in Johnson (2002) and Miller/Fang (2012); the impact of inflation targeting on output growth and its volatility is shown in in Walsh (2009), Brito/Bystedt (2010), andMollick et al (2011); the impact on exchange rates and international reserves are discussed in Lin (2010); and the labor market outcomes and the inflation-unemployment trade-off are discussed by Lundborg/Sacklen (2006), Epstein (2008), Louis/Balli (2013), Seim/Zetterberg (2013), andHuang/Yeh (2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%