Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension

Abstract

In general, language comprehension is surprisingly reliable. Listeners very rapidly extract meaning from the unfolding speech signal, on a word-by-word basis, and usually successfully. Research on Fsemantic illusions_ however suggests that under certain conditions, people fail to notice that the linguistic input simply doesn't make sense. In the current event-related brain potentials (ERP) study, we examined whether listeners would, under such conditions, spontaneously detect an anomaly in which a human character central to the story at hand (e.g., ''a tourist'') was suddenly replaced by an inanimate object (e.g., ''a suitcase''). Because this replacement introduced a very powerful coherence break, we expected listeners to immediately notice the anomaly and generate the standard ERP effect associated with incoherent language, the N400 effect. However, instead of the standard N400 effect, anomalous words elicited a positive ERP effect from about 500 -600 ms onwards. The absence of an N400 effect suggests that subjects did not immediately notice the anomaly, and that for a few hundred milliseconds the comprehension system has converged on an apparently coherent but factually incorrect interpretation. The presence of the later ERP effect indicates that subjects were processing for comprehension and did ultimately detect the anomaly. Therefore, we take the absence of a regular N400 effect as the online manifestation of a temporary semantic illusion. Our results also show that even attentive listeners sometimes fail to notice a radical change in the nature of a story character, and therefore suggest a case of short-lived Fsemantic change deafness_ in language comprehension. D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Theme: Neural basis of behavior Topic: Cognition

Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective

“…For reasons outlined elsewhere Hagoort, 1999, see also Snijders et al, 2005), the suggestion that the P600 effect is really a P300 oddball effect (Coulson and Kutas, 1998) can most likely be put aside. However, P600-like effects have also been observed in paradigms where an N400 effect would have been more obvious (Kim and Osterhout, 2006;Kolk et al, 2003;Kuperberg et al, 2003;Nieuwland and Van Berkum, 2005;Van Herten et al, 2005). This could be taken to suggest that within language comprehension, the P600 effect is not exclusively associated with syntactic analysis (cf.…”

Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension

“…The eADM can generate biphasic patterns, but it does not explain the results of Kos et al (2010). Furthermore, none of the five models can account for the Nieuwland and van Berkum (2005) data on discourse processing. Thus, our review casts doubt on the explanatory power and validity of these multi-stream architectures.…”

“…Nieuwland and van Berkum (2005) tested whether the 'Semantic Illusion' phenomenon extended to wider discourse as well. They presented participants with stories like:…”

The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs

“…For the first list, 30 stories of each condition were pseudorandomly mixed with 60 filler stories (these were based on materials from Nieuwland & Van Berkum, 2005, though shortened and adapted to match the current visual presentation of the final sentence) such that neither condition occurred more than two times consecutively, while trials of each type were matched on average list position. The other three lists were derived from the first by rotating the different trial types.…”