Testing the mood-state hypothesis among previously depressed and never-depressed individuals

Brosse, Alisha L.; Craighead, Linda W.; Craighead, W. Edward

doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(99)80048-3

Cited by 35 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a second study, they found that following an elation mood induction, women reported decreased conviction in dysfunctional beliefs, whereas following a depressed mood induction, women reported increased conviction in dysfunctional beliefs (although this effect reached the level of trend; Miranda et al, 1998). These findings, along with those from similar studies (e.g., Brosse, Craighead, & Craighead, 1999), support the hypothesis that changes in affect valence influence belief conviction.…”

Section: Empirical Support For the Second Premisesupporting

confidence: 87%

The Bidirectional Relations between Affect and Belief

Boden

Berenbaum

2010

Review of General Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whereas a majority of previous work has focused on the cognitive factors that influence beliefs, current theory and research suggest that affect also plays an important role. In this article, we comprehensively describe the bidirectional relations between affect and belief. On the basis of our review of existing theory and research, we develop the following three empirically derived premises. First, the need to make sense of experience and the need to regulate affect drive a reciprocal feedback loop through which affect and belief influence each other. Second, changes in affect arousal, valence, and type influence belief content and conviction. Third, changes in belief content and conviction influence affect arousal, valence, and type. We discuss empirical research supporting each premise, needed empirical tests, and avenues for future research.

show abstract

Section: Empirical Support For the Second Premisesupporting

confidence: 87%

The Bidirectional Relations between Affect and Belief

Boden

Berenbaum

2010

Review of General Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It may be that the LEIDS is more sensitive than a laboratory procedure to cover the type of inferences people make on the basis of their negative mood in daily life. Consistent with this, more than 10 studies have now shown that the LEIDS-R is sensitive to depression history with no known replication failures, whereas studies using mood inductions regularly fail to distinguish between recovered depressed and never-depressed individuals (e.g., Brosse et al, 1999;van der Does, 2005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Cognitive reactivity, self-depressed associations, and the recurrence of depression

Elgersma

Jong

Rijsbergen

et al. 2015

Journal of Affective Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Research exploring cognitive reactivity relying mostly on priming studies has yielded varied results in terms of comparisons between depressed and non-depressed populations. Some research suggests that individuals with a depressive history can be differentiated from never depressed controls (Gemar et al 2001;Miranda and Persons 1988;Segal et al 1999); however, other studies have demonstrated that there is a link between depressed affect and negative cognitions in non-clinical populations as well (Brosse et al 1999). For example, in a mood induction study, Fresco et al (2006) found an increase in negative cognitions after a sad mood B. D. Gilbert (&) Á M. S. Christopher School of Professional Psychology, Pacific University, 511 SW 10th Avenue, Suite 400, Portland, OR 97205, USA e-mail: gilb8581@pacificu.edu provocation among a college student sample, regardless of depressive history.…”

Section: Depressive Affect and Negative Cognitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mindfulness-Based Attention as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Depressive Affect and Negative Cognitions

Gilbert

Christopher

2009

Cogn Ther Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this research we investigated the role of mindfulness-based attention in mitigating possible negative consequences of experiencing depressive affect. A sample of 278 undergraduate college students completed selfreport measures of depressive affect, negative cognitions, and mindfulness-based attention. As expected, depressive affect was positively related to negative cognitions, mindfulness-based attention was inversely related to negative cognitions, and the strength of the relationship between depressed affect and negative cognitions was significantly moderated by mindfulness-based attention. More specifically, a simple slope analysis revealed that individuals low in mindfulness-based attention evidenced a statistically significant relationship between depressive affect and negative cognitions, whereas individuals who are high in mindfulness-based attention did not. These findings support the extant literature suggesting that the general tendency to be mindful may be a protective factor against the development of psychopathology and enhance mental health.

show abstract

Testing the mood-state hypothesis among previously depressed and never-depressed individuals

Cited by 35 publications

References 45 publications

The Bidirectional Relations between Affect and Belief

The Bidirectional Relations between Affect and Belief

Cognitive reactivity, self-depressed associations, and the recurrence of depression

Mindfulness-Based Attention as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Depressive Affect and Negative Cognitions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About