2020
DOI: 10.4038/cbj.v11i1.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Profitability of Technical Trading Rules across Market Cycles: Evidence from India

Abstract: This study examines the economic feasibility of technical analysis, such as relative strength index, moving average convergence and divergence in Indian context. Bombay Stock Exchange Sensex Index historical data were collected from BSE data base for the period from February, 2000 to May, 2018. The selected data were further categorised into Bull and Bear markets to test the technical tools performance across market cycle. The results exhibited that relative strength index trading rule failed to deliver the po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) based hybrid models performed significantly better than the Wavelet-ARIMA-based (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) models (90% of the time) when first-ranked models are considered. Muruganandan (2020) tested the profitability of technical indicators, i.e., RSI and MACD, on different market cycles of BSE Sensex, where the findings showed that, even before accounting for trading expenses, the RSI trading rule could not produce a positive return. Yet, throughout the Bear market period, the sell signal produced by MACD trading rules beat both the mean return and the unconditional mean return of the buy signal, but it could neither help with market timing nor a reduction in losing trades.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) based hybrid models performed significantly better than the Wavelet-ARIMA-based (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) models (90% of the time) when first-ranked models are considered. Muruganandan (2020) tested the profitability of technical indicators, i.e., RSI and MACD, on different market cycles of BSE Sensex, where the findings showed that, even before accounting for trading expenses, the RSI trading rule could not produce a positive return. Yet, throughout the Bear market period, the sell signal produced by MACD trading rules beat both the mean return and the unconditional mean return of the buy signal, but it could neither help with market timing nor a reduction in losing trades.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muruganandana exhibited results that showed the failure of the relative strength index trading rule to deliver the positive return even before deducting transaction cost. However, by moving the average convergence and divergence trading rules, sell signal outperformed the unconditional mean return and buy signal mean return, during the Bear market period before deducting transaction cost [26]. Besides that, Chong and Ng examined the effectiveness of technical analysis to produce excess return in the London stock exchange by using Moving Average Convergence-Divergence (MACD) and Relative Strength Index (RSI) as shown in Table 3.2.…”
Section: Global Combination Of Effective Multi Technical Strategy Dev...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Selection of good financial status EPS: From Figures 2 and 3, this study discovered important rules for the positive/negative status of listed stock, which can help investors to manage effective investment strategy. (6) The best practice of enablers: From the study results, it was found that the best classifier is the decision tree C4.5 algorithm for the TEJ dataset, and the best model is Models D and E in terms of average accuracy. (7) Interpretation of two data-split methods: It was found that the cross-validation data approach makes more appropriate use of the TEJ dataset than the percentage-split data approach.…”
Section: Helpful Research Findings and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, market price trends or movements are not random but specific trends or movements of an identified pattern. Over the past decade, commonly used indicators include price trend indices, such as varied types of the moving average (MA) [5] or momentum indices, such as moving average convergence and divergence (MACD) [6]. MA has an average of closing prices of a specific number of time periods, such as a 7-period MA for seven days, which defines a flowing correlation between the time period and the money rate [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%