2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the psychophysical characteristics of professional drivers – Can we identify unsafe drivers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some PVT measures (i.e., a reliable and objective measure of sleepiness, sensible to circadian and homeostatic factors [12,90,101]) showed a moderate effect size, the results of the ANOVAs did not reach statistical significance. Finally, young subjects accept higher levels of risk at the wheel (WRB-TV) than older adults, consistently with the studies that report greater impulsiveness while driving by young people [102][103][104][105].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some PVT measures (i.e., a reliable and objective measure of sleepiness, sensible to circadian and homeostatic factors [12,90,101]) showed a moderate effect size, the results of the ANOVAs did not reach statistical significance. Finally, young subjects accept higher levels of risk at the wheel (WRB-TV) than older adults, consistently with the studies that report greater impulsiveness while driving by young people [102][103][104][105].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…After considering the differences between the two groups, it is not surprising that the multiple regression approach confirms that age is the best predictor of poor driving performance, confirming the validity of the Vienna Test System TRAFFIC in discriminating subjects' performances based on age [97][98][99][100][101][102]106].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Traffic accidents were used as a dependent variable in examining the validity of traffic psychological assessment systems in a few studies. In relation to traffic accidents, there were only differences for complex reaction time and reasoning based on cognitive‐psychomotor abilities in one study (Amado et al, 2004), but no difference was reported in other studies (Hergovich et al, 2008; Vujanić et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…5, anger intensity increases along with the increase of educated level of the subjects, which may have a deviation with our common sense. Vujanic et al [29] found that drivers with high educated level, have better psychophysical characteristics including general intelligence, concentration level and stress tolerance, with regard to driving safety. Note that the investigated subjects presenting anger states, especially medium and high anger were born in the 1980s or 1990s, which means that they generally received a comparably good education due to economic development of China during their growth.…”
Section: ) Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%