2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.054420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the radiation emanating from the molecular nanomagnetFe8during magnetization reversals

Abstract: In the molecular nanomagnet Fe8 tunneling can occur from a metastable state to an excited state followed by a transition to the ground state. This transition is accompanied by an energy release of 115.6 GHz. We constructed an experimental setup to measure whether this energy is released in the form of thermal or electromagnetic energy. Contrary to a previous publication we find no evidence for release of electromagnetic radiation. Our results for transitions between the first and second excited states to the g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Superradiance, the relaxation of an ensemble of emitters at a rate proportional to the square of their number, is another manifestation of coherent coupling of emitters to the quantized cavity field. It was predicted to occur in the molecular magnets, but the experimental results so far remain inconclusive [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. As opposed to superradiance, the superradiant phase is a ground state property of the coupled emitter-cavity system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superradiance, the relaxation of an ensemble of emitters at a rate proportional to the square of their number, is another manifestation of coherent coupling of emitters to the quantized cavity field. It was predicted to occur in the molecular magnets, but the experimental results so far remain inconclusive [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. As opposed to superradiance, the superradiant phase is a ground state property of the coupled emitter-cavity system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 we present the sweep rates as a function of the normalized magnetization jumps for n = 1. The inset shows raw data taken from Leviant work 16 . Due to the limited number of data points the fit parameters are determined with large error bars.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%