2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the rogue taxa hypothesis for clustering instability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rogue sequences introduce instability to a phylogeny by jumping around from one place to another and may change the relationships and branch supports within the phylogeny unpredictably [ 47 , 48 ]. To remove such rogue sequences as well as long branches, we split the dataset randomly into subsets of about 900 sequences, aligned each subset with PASTA and built a phylogenetic tree and bootstrap trees with IQ-Tree 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rogue sequences introduce instability to a phylogeny by jumping around from one place to another and may change the relationships and branch supports within the phylogeny unpredictably [ 47 , 48 ]. To remove such rogue sequences as well as long branches, we split the dataset randomly into subsets of about 900 sequences, aligned each subset with PASTA and built a phylogenetic tree and bootstrap trees with IQ-Tree 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rogue sequences and the sequences of the long branches were removed from the main dataset with SeqKit. However, since what a rogue sequence is, depends also on the other sequences in the dataset [ 48 ], we repeated this splitting and removal procedure for 20 iterations. Once the 20 iterations were complete, we used iteration 10 as a base and built from there trees containing all sequences up to iteration 20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%